Friday, April 25, 2014

Blinded by the Light (Fourth Sunday in Lent)

John 9
1 As he walked along, he saw a man blind from birth. 2 His disciples asked him, "Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?" 3 Jesus answered, "Neither this man nor his parents sinned; he was born blind so that God's works might be revealed in him. 4 We must work the works of him who sent me while it is day; night is coming when no one can work. 5 As long as I am in the world, I am the light of the world." 6 When he had said this, he spat on the ground and made mud with the saliva and spread the mud on the man's eyes, 7 saying to him, "Go, wash in the pool of Siloam" (which means Sent). Then he went and washed and came back able to see. 8 The neighbors and those who had seen him before as a beggar began to ask, "Is this not the man who used to sit and beg?" 9 Some were saying, "It is he." Others were saying, "No, but it is someone like him." He kept saying, "I am the man." 10 But they kept asking him, "Then how were your eyes opened?" 11 He answered, "The man called Jesus made mud, spread it on my eyes, and said to me, "Go to Siloam and wash.' Then I went and washed and received my sight." 12 They said to him, "Where is he?" He said, "I do not know." 13 They brought to the Pharisees the man who had formerly been blind. 14 Now it was a sabbath day when Jesus made the mud and opened his eyes. 15 Then the Pharisees also began to ask him how he had received his sight. He said to them, "He put mud on my eyes. Then I washed, and now I see." 16 Some of the Pharisees said, "This man is not from God, for he does not observe the sabbath." But others said, "How can a man who is a sinner perform such signs?" And they were divided. 17 So they said again to the blind man, "What do you say about him? It was your eyes he opened." He said, "He is a prophet." 18 The Jews did not believe that he had been blind and had received his sight until they called the parents of the man who had received his sight 19 and asked them, "Is this your son, who you say was born blind? How then does he now see?" 20 His parents answered, "We know that this is our son, and that he was born blind; 21 but we do not know how it is that now he sees, nor do we know who opened his eyes. Ask him; he is of age. He will speak for himself." 22 His parents said this because they were afraid of the Jews; for the Jews had already agreed that anyone who confessed Jesus to be the Messiah would be put out of the synagogue. 23 Therefore his parents said, "He is of age; ask him." 24 So for the second time they called the man who had been blind, and they said to him, "Give glory to God! We know that this man is a sinner." 25 He answered, "I do not know whether he is a sinner. One thing I do know, that though I was blind, now I see." 26 They said to him, "What did he do to you? How did he open your eyes?" 27 He answered them, "I have told you already, and you would not listen. Why do you want to hear it again? Do you also want to become his disciples?" 28 Then they reviled him, saying, "You are his disciple, but we are disciples of Moses. 29 We know that God has spoken to Moses, but as for this man, we do not know where he comes from." 30 The man answered, "Here is an astonishing thing! You do not know where he comes from, and yet he opened my eyes. 31 We know that God does not listen to sinners, but he does listen to one who worships him and obeys his will. 32 Never since the world began has it been heard that anyone opened the eyes of a person born blind. 33 If this man were not from God, he could do nothing." 34 They answered him, "You were born entirely in sins, and are you trying to teach us?" And they drove him out. 35 Jesus heard that they had driven him out, and when he found him, he said, "Do you believe in the Son of Man?" 36 He answered, "And who is he, sir? Tell me, so that I may believe in him." 37 Jesus said to him, "You have seen him, and the one speaking with you is he." 38 He said, "Lord, I believe." And he worshiped him. 39 Jesus said, "I came into this world for judgment so that those who do not see may see, and those who do see may become blind." 40 Some of the Pharisees near him heard this and said to him, "Surely we are not blind, are we?" 41 Jesus said to them, "If you were blind, you would not have sin. But now that you say, ‘We see,' your sin remains.”

            It all started with a question…and what a question it was! It was the kind of question you have no doubt asked in one way or another at some point in your own life. It was the kind of question that comes loaded with all sorts of preconceived notions, all kinds of pre-packaged answers created by so-called certainties held by those for whom the unknown and mysterious are too uncomfortable. It was the kind of question a student might naturally ask a teacher, the kind of question a disciple might ask a rabbi when traveling in Jerusalem in the first century[1] when they come upon a man blind from birth: "Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?"
            “Whose fault is it?” That’s what they want to know. Who’s to blame for this man’s apparent disability? Don’t we ask the same kinds of questions? I mean, they may sound different, involve different circumstances, use different words, but the questions we ask are essentially the same, and can usually be boiled down to three little letters: W-H-Y. “Why...Why did this happen to me…Why does this keep happening to my family…Why do those people get the things I want even though they obviously don’t deserve it…Why isn’t life fair?” We ask these kinds of questions all the time. In fact, for many of us, it is those kinds of questions that bring us to places like this on days like today; we’re looking for the answers to life’s biggest questions, the biggest of which is “Why?”
            While Jesus’ disciples use a different interrogative in their question to Jesus, the gist of the question is the same: “Why was this man born blind?” They have two answers already lined up, so surely Jesus would clear the air for them; he’d sort out the truth between these two, religiously and culturally approved answers. You see, in the first century it was understood that if a child was born with some malformation, some imperfection, then it was either the result of that child performing some sort of pre-natal, pre-existent sin, or its parents had committed some sort of sin that was either transferred to the child or the child’s imperfection was a punishment for the parents’ sin. Likely, the disciples knew of these two commonly held understandings, but they wanted Jesus to tell them which one it really was—at least in the case of this one blind man. Unfortunately, Jesus doesn’t really give them the sort of clarification they wanted.
            In verses 3-5, Jesus seems to speak over the disciples’ question, not providing the sort of answer they wanted, but going farther to speak words about the disciples themselves—not the blind man:  “Jesus answered, ‘Neither this man nor his parents sinned; he was born blind so that God's works might be revealed in him. We must work the works of him who sent me while it is day; night is coming when no one can work.  As long as I am in the world, I am the light of the world.’" Now, I don’t want any of you to get the wrong idea here. Too many times this passage has been used to justify the belief that God is somehow responsible for all the terrible things that cross our paths on this side of eternity, but understand this: when Jesus says “this man was born blind so that God’s works might be revealed in him,” this isn’t some universal declaration that all the tragedies of life are somehow miraculous instances waiting to break forth on the world. No, Jesus is speaking of that particular instance and (more specifically) the reactions that follow Jesus’ restoration of sight to the blind man. After all, to hold to such a view of tragedy (that God is going to use every case as some miraculous occurrence) all too often leads us down a road of disappointment in the divine; it leads to the kinds of accusations of blame that Jesus’s disciples had in the first place. That isn’t the point of Jesus’ response.
            After Jesus’ unanticipated answer to his disciples, he does something even more surprising. Unsolicited, Jesus spits on the ground, mixes the dirt and saliva together to make a little mud, places the mud on the eyes of the blind man, and then tells him to wash in the pool of Siloam. Seems a bit odd doesn’t it? Perhaps we’ve grown so used to the gospel story that its strangeness is lost on us, but imagine for a moment what it must have been like: a band of strangers, passing through a neighborhood, and when they come upon the local blind beggar, one of them spits on the ground and rubs it in the blind man’s eyes and tells him go wash his face! That almost seems like a cruel joke! But we know something more, something divine, takes place, because we’re told the man comes back and can see! The change that has come over the man is so complete, so powerful that the people in the town (people who have likely passed him by dozens of times) aren’t even sure if it’s really the same man who used to beg for their pocket change! If the story ended here, it would be amazing. It would be the kind of story we’d tell over and over again at vacation Bible schools; it would be the kind of story that we’d see illuminated with stain glass or painted on the ceilings and altars of cathedrals. Of course, we do tell this story at VBS, and we do see it in church art from time-to-time, but we only see and hear a part of the story; we need to hear (as Paul Harvey was famous for saying) the rest of the story, the story of what happens after the man comes back from Siloam with the ability to see, with the ability to walk in the light and no longer grope in the life-long dark of blindness.
            What started with one question leads to many more questions. When the man returns, able to see, those who knew him kept asking him, "Then how were your eyes opened?" They want to know how, by what manner was this man who had been born blind now able to see. And he gives them the straightforward answer in verse 11: He answered, "The man called Jesus made mud, spread it on my eyes, and said to me, ‘Go to Siloam and wash.' Then I went and washed and received my sight." Straight, to-the-point facts about how he received his sight. But his answer only leads to more questions.
They ask him where Jesus is; he doesn’t know. They take him to a group of Pharisees, where he is asked to recount the whole ordeal again. These Pharisees dismiss Jesus as a sinner, but that only leads to more questions that lead to division among the Pharisses: "How can a man who is a sinner perform such signs?" That only leads to more questions directed at the formerly blind man: "What do you say about him? It was your eyes he opened." He said, "He is a prophet." When they weren’t satisfied with the man’s answer they called his parents! (You can imagine his possible shame and embarrassment at this point.) His parents, out of their fear of what might happen to them if it even looks like they might support Jesus, defer back to their son, who is, after all, a big boy and can answer his own questions! So, they call the man out on the carpet a second time and say “Give glory to God! We know that this man is a sinner." They have moved past trying to understand how this man received his sight and have focused their energy on debunking Jesus as a prophet, as one from God with the power to restore sight to the blind.
But it is the man’s response to their demand in this second round of interrogation that turns this story around. In verse 25, He answered, "I do not know whether he is a sinner. One thing I do know, that though I was blind, now I see." Can you hear what he’s saying? "I do not know whether he is a sinner. One thing I do know, that though I was blind, now I see." This is no grand confession of orthodoxy, no theological creed or divine proclamation. This man’s words are words spoken from experience; this is an announcement of lived transformation, not a statement of bulleted theological points, but a pronouncement that comes directly from this man’s experience with Christ!
His interrogators, however, are unimpressed, so they continue with the same line of questioning: they said to him, "What did he do to you? How did he open your eyes?" You can almost hear the irritation in the man’s voice in verse 27: He answered them, "I have told you already, and you would not listen. Why do you want to hear it again? Do you also want to become his disciples?" Put off by the sheer notion of being disciples of Jesus they respond to the man’s bold reply: "You are his disciple, but we are disciples of Moses. We know that God has spoken to Moses, but as for this man, we do not know where he comes from." What follows in verses 30-34 is an exchange between the man and his questioners that leads to the man’s expulsion from the synagogue, a socially and culturally disastrous outcome, even for one who had already been on the margins as a blind beggar. For all intents and purposes the recently-blind man has become an outcast in every sense of the word, all because a man he had never met, rubbed some mud in his eyes, and now he can see.
What happens in the final verses of our text this morning helps to shine a light on all that has taken place up to this point: Jesus heard that they had driven him out, and when he found him, he said, "Do you believe in the Son of Man?" He answered, "And who is he, sir? Tell me, so that I may believe in him." Jesus said to him, "You have seen him, and the one speaking with you is he." He said, "Lord, I believe." And he worshiped him. Jesus goes out to find the man—the man who was exiled because of Jesus’ unsolicited healing—and when he finds him, he reveals his identity to the man (just as he had done to Nicodemus and the Samaritan woman at the well), and John tells us “he worshipped [Jesus].” The man recognized there was something more, something greater behind his renewed sight; there was the gift to see what even those who’ve had 20/20 vision their entire lives were unable to see—the presence of God.
In verse 39 Jesus said, "I came into this world for judgment so that those who do not see may see, and those who do see may become blind." Then, in verse 40: Some of the Pharisees near him heard this and said to him, "Surely we are not blind, are we?" And Jesus said to them, "If you were blind, you would not have sin. But now that you say, ‘We see,' your sin remains.” Just as in the nighttime visit with Nicodemus and the midday conversation with the Samaritan woman by the well, Jesus has used a real, temporal metaphor to expose the mysterious, eternal ways of God. Like birth and water, sight is something many of us take for granted, and when we hear Jesus’ words about being born again from above, words about living water, or words about receiving sight we just assume that we’ve figured it out, that we’ve got it down pat because we’ve been in places like this our whole lives, or because we’ve memorized a few cherry-picked verses of Scripture, or because we have power, influence, and authority in our community, in our church, or both. We can hear Jesus’ words with the ears of the Pharisees and think, "Surely we are not blind, are we?" Surely Jesus isn’t talking to me; surely Jesus is talking to all of “those” people (and you all know who “those” people are in your lives), but then Jesus does what Jesus does best: he strips away our arrogance and our pride and makes us face the truth, just as he did to those Pharisees: "If you were blind, you would not have sin. But now that you say, ‘We see,' your sin remains.”
If we think we’re “out of the woods,” if we think we’ve figured it all out, if we think that we’re the ones with every answer and everyone else needs to get on board with us…then Jesus’ words are sharply pointed directly at us. You see, it all started with a question, one, simple, little question, and Jesus quickly shows us that there aren’t always simple answers to our questions, that the universe is filled with the deep mystery of who God is, and that Jesus is calling us to follow him into that mystery, to leave behind our assumptions and our absolutes, to be totally dependent upon the God who gives sight to the blind, water to the thirsty, and new life to all who seek it.
Perhaps you’ve come to this place this morning with your own questions. Perhaps you’ve come hoping for answers. I hope rather than finding answers, you’ve found something more, something more mysterious, something that requires more than a boiled-down theological proclamation. Maybe you’ve found more questions, questions that will provoke more questions and a desire for a deeper relationship with God. Perhaps you’ve come this way this morning with questions and now realize that the answers you hoped to find are wonderfully small in the presence of an all-loving God. And maybe you’re in this room this morning and God is inviting you out of the darkness, out of your blindness, and into the sight-giving light of the love of Jesus. May we all respond to the Light of the World as it shines on us this day.
Let us pray…




[1] Gerard Sloyan, Interpretation: John. Westminster John Knox Press: Louisville, KY (1988) p.112.

No comments:

Post a Comment