Wednesday, December 11, 2019

"Do you not care?" (Fifth Sunday after Pentecost)


Mark 4:35-41
35 On that day, when evening had come, he said to them, "Let us go across to the other side." 36 And leaving the crowd behind, they took him with them in the boat, just as he was. Other boats were with him. 37 A great windstorm arose, and the waves beat into the boat, so that the boat was already being swamped. 38 But he was in the stern, asleep on the cushion; and they woke him up and said to him, "Teacher, do you not care that we are perishing?" 39 He woke up and rebuked the wind, and said to the sea, "Peace! Be still!" Then the wind ceased, and there was a dead calm. 40 He said to them, "Why are you afraid? Have you still no faith?" 41 And they were filled with great awe and said to one another, "Who then is this, that even the wind and the sea obey him?"

“I have to tell her,” he said. “I have to tell her my true feelings.” I suppose teenage infatuation makes poets of even the most unlikely candidates. He had been wrestling with these feelings for days, which to most of us at that age can feel like months. He had to tell her how he felt, how he thought about her often, how he wanted to ask her out but was afraid she’d say no because they didn’t go to the same high school. My friend was telling me all about how much he liked this girl, perhaps hoping I’d give him a rousing pep talk that would propel him from the passenger seat of my pick-up and over into the small crowd of girls gathered in the parking lot. It’s funny now, but back then relationships seemed more than necessary. Back then, when we were teenagers, it seemed like life wouldn’t go on without someone to take to a movie every once in a while, someone to spoil with cheddar biscuits at Red Lobster or the salad bar at Ruby Tuesdays (or in my case, the first date that landed the love of my life: two Dairy Queen chicken finger sandwiches, a Diet Mountain Dew, and an orange Fanta). He sat there until he couldn’t stand it anymore. Then, he opened the door of my truck, got out, walked across the parking lot, and told this girl his true feelings. I watched him slink back to the truck, climb in, shut the door, and tell me, “Let’s just go home.”
He poured his soul out to this girl. He did what takes mountains of courage for most boys that age to do. He did it all in the broad light of a buzzing street lamp and in the close proximity of other girls—her friends. He took the bold risk that has inspired playwrights, novelists, and poets, and it burned him. It burned him bad, because, you see, she didn’t respond with a bubbly reaction, reciting her own hidden feelings for him. No, it was worse than that. She didn’t laugh in his face and tell him to hit the bricks. No, it was even worse than that. When my friend poured his feelings out to this girl, the event which had no doubt kept him awake at night for days before, the moment he may have perhaps imagined with its own soundtrack—when he told this girl his true feelings for her, she said what may be the most devastating grouping of syllables in our language. He poured his heart out to her, and all she said in response was “I don’t care.”
“I don’t care.” Man, those words will cut you more than just about anything else. They’ll leave you with an emotional hole, an emptiness, when they come from one for whom you yourself actually care. Sure, we might say them flippantly when talking about where to go for lunch after church or what movie we want to pick up from the Red Box on our way out of Walmart, but to hear someone say, “I don’t care” after you’ve followed, after you’ve poured yourself out to them, after you’ve taken so many risks just to show them you care…that hurts in a way beyond description, but what hurts even more, what can inflict even greater pain and leave our hearts broken and ground into dust is when we think no one cares without them ever having to say it, when we think someone doesn’t care because of their complete lack of interest in our well-being. At least an enemy thinks enough of us to hurt us, but for someone to just not care…
“Teacher, do you not care…?” That’s what they said when they woke him up. I mean, when you’re in a skinny jon boat without so much as a trolling motor, crossing a big lake late at night, and the wind whips up and a storm breaks lose and “the waves beat into the boat, so that the boat was already being swamped,” and the one who dragged you out into the middle of all this chaos is asleep in the boat—on a cushion—yeah, I could get the feeling he doesn’t care. Who does that? Who takes a nap when the waves are crashing all around, when the storm is raging, when it seems like all hell is breaking lose and even the experts (fishermen who would have no doubt been out on the lake more than once when a storm rolled in) are crossing themselves as they put on the orange life vests? Who, if he had the power to stop it, would just go right on sleeping through all of this chaos? Obviously some one who doesn’t care, right?
“Teacher, do you not care that we are perishing?” I’ve heard similar words. I’ve heard similar words from my own mouth. Of course, they weren’t spoken in the midst of a storm on a lake somewhere off the coast of some village in ancient Judea. No, they were spoken in the darkness, towards the ceiling as I lay in bed, in the car after a long, excruciating day, in my office after hearing of another tragedy, after reading another story. The words themselves were different, but their intent was the same: “God, do you not care that people are dying? Do you not care that children are starving? Do you not care that good people are hurting? Do you not care that I’m trying my best?” I’ve said these words, and I bet you have too. When your best laid plans fall through your fingers like so many grains of sand, when all you’ve worked so hard for goes up in flames with a single word, a single envelope in the mailbox, when the phone rings and the voice on the other end sends your world careening into a chaotic tailspin, I bet you’ve said those words. “God, do you not care that we are perishing?”
Too often it can seem like God is just taking it easy, cat-napping on some clouded cushion while the world burns. Too often it can feel like God doesn’t care, like God is far off in heaven, making sure the right folks are getting through the gate and the wrong folks are getting turned away. Maybe that’s on God. After all, if God really cared, wouldn’t God do something about all of this mess? Wouldn’t God have intervened before it got this bad, cutting it off at the pass, making sure things never got this out of hand? I mean, couldn’t God at least make sure the storms pass before we get in the boat, maybe wait until morning, when there’s light to see, when storms on the horizon are easier to spot, when our confidence to row is greater? Can’t God keep evil folks from rising to power? Can’t God manipulate our circumstances enough to make sure we don’t lose our job, to make sure no child ever goes hungry, to make sure the crops grow, the nets fill with fish, the bank account stays on the positive side, to make sure we never have to go to war again? Can’t God do that if God really cares about all of this? Why does it feel like God’s just asleep somewhere?
Then again, maybe that’s on us. Things don’t just happen without folks making them happen, and even when a storm rolls in on the lake at night, no one had to get on the boat, right? Maybe God seems to not care because so often it seems like we don’t care. I mean, how can someone be comfortable enough to fall asleep on a boat if he thought the captain and the other professionals were anxious, worried, and tense? I couldn’t sleep on a car ride if I thought the driver was nervous! Maybe, when it seems like God doesn’t care, it’s really the amplification of our own apathy, a reflection of our own disinterest. I don’t know, but I do know there does seem to be a growing sense of folks not caring, especially about others, as if there’s a growing attitude that says, “Who cares if these others make it to the other shore, as long as me and mine get there….” Maybe it’s on us.
Really, though, I’m partial to believing that it’s all in the way we see things, the way we perceive our circumstances. I mean, think about what’s going on in this scene: the storm comes, pounds the boat, these disciples, these professional fishermen, are scared, and in their fear, they say, “Teacher, do you not care that we are perishing?” You know how I hear that? “Teacher, do you not care that we are perishing?” It’s like they believe they’ll all die why Jesus goes right on sleeping. But there’s a very important lesson here; it’s easy to overlook because it’s so obvious. They overlook—so do we.
“On that day, when evening had come, he said to them, ‘Let us go across to the other side.’ And leaving the crowd behind, they took him with them in the boat, just as he was. Other boats were with him.” Did you catch it? It’s so obvious, but so subtle. “[T]hey took him with them in the boat, just as he was.” Jesus is in the boat with them. He got right in the boat—he may have been in this very boat while he was teaching the crowd in starting in verse one. Jesus is in the boat with them. Do you get what’s happening here? Jesus isn’t back on the shore when the storm rolls in. He’s not spending the night in some Holiday Inn when the phone rings and the disciples are asking, “Teacher, do you not care that we are perishing out here on this lake while you’re relaxing in a bathrobe on a cushion indoors?!” He’s in the boat with them! He’s right there in the midst of the storm, not above it, not beyond it, not behind it—right smackdab in the middle of it with them. And you get the impression they’ve forgotten about that too. Don’t we all?
Sure, Jesus wakes up, rebukes the wind, calms the storm, as if he’s exorcising some demon, but he doesn’t do it from the sidelines, from a throne in heaven, from the isolated, sterile sanctuary where only the best, brightest, right, and righteous reside. He does it right in their midst, in the midst of the storm—in spite of the storm, in spite of their fear, in spite of all that would otherwise make sense. Jesus speaks peace in the midst of the chaos, because that’s where Jesus is, right there in the middle of it all.
I know, there are times in our lives when it feels like the storm will overtake us, when the wind will overpower us, when we can’t take one more bit of bad news, when we can’t hear one more tragic story, when we can’t take one more hit, when we can’t get out of bed in the morning, when we can’t answer that call one more time, when we can’t make that call one more time. I know, there are times when we want to look up to the heavens and ask, “God, don’t you care that I am dying?!” Can I tell you something? Don’t expect an answer from the sky, because God’s not there. God’s right there in the midst of all that junk with you, right there in the swirling clouds of thunder and fear, right there in the raging waters of uncertainty and dread, right there, in the place where the divine and the human meet, in the midst of fear, grief, pain, faith, hope, and love. God’s not asleep on the cushion; God’s hanging on the cross, right there in the midst of it all, in this battered boat with us. Amen.

"Shifting Blame" (Third Sunday after Pentecost)


Genesis 3:8-15

Everything was perfect. Everything was in its place. Everything was ready to go. So, how did it all come crashing down? The stories of creation in the first two chapters of Genesis are well known to most readers of the Bible. Whether you’re of the ilk that reads these stories literally, meshing them together to suggest that God created the entirety of the universe in six, literal, twenty-four-hour days, or whether you read them as an Ancient Near Eastern attempt to make sense of the world and its origins, these stories set the tone for what unfolds in the biblical narrative. These stories tell of a God who creates an ideal world—land, seas, sky, a garden, creatures that exist in harmony, a man and woman who are stewards of it all. If there is one blemish on the whole thing it’s that tree stuck in the middle of it all, a tree from which the man and woman are forbidden to eat, a tree whose mere existence is puzzling and creates within us all sorts of questions about God and why God would create such a prohibition in the primordial paradise of Eden. While we could spend quite some time pondering the nature of this tree’s existence, it is enough to know it’s there and God has forbidden the man and the woman from eating its fruit.
What’s perhaps more important is that this is the only prohibition given to this couple by God; there aren’t ten commandments, no library whose shelves are filled with leather-bound volumes of laws, restrictions, sanctions, and proscriptions, just this one, tiny thing in chapter two, verses sixteen and seventeen: “You may eat freely of every tree of the garden; but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you shall die.” That’s all; “don’t eat the fruit from that one tree.” Now, we can tell this sinks in a bit farther in Eve’s conversation with this snake in chapter three, verses two and three, because she takes the prohibition a step farther, when she tells the snake, “We may eat of the fruit of the trees in the garden; but God said, ‘You shall not eat of the fruit of the tree that is in the middle of the garden, nor shall you touch it, or you shall die.’” God said, “don’t eat it;” God did not say, “don’t touch it.” Still, it’s just one rule, one restriction; everything else is fair game. The woman (along with her husband “who was with her”), however, breaks this single command when she takes the fruit from the tree, and she and her husband eat.
Now, if I were to sit as judge over all humankind, if I were the one who had to review all the great atrocities of human history and hand down the sentence after each guilty verdict, you know I just might let these two off the hook. After all, it’s not like they committed murder; all they did was eat forbidden fruit. On the surface, it’s no different than those times growing up when my grandma would pull off the side of the road next to a peanut field and have us boys run out and grab a few bushes to take home to boil (they weren’t going to miss them, and no one got hurt).  I mean, there are far worse things to do than eat some prohibited produce, right? But you know, if I really think about it—if I really think about their situation and their infraction upon this solitary rule, I might not let them off so easily. In fact, I might just want to throw the book at them! I mean, it was just one rule—the only rule they had to follow. How in the world could they break the one rule, the one law—how is it possible that they would transgress the single prohibition given to them by God when they were surrounded by paradise?! They’re the very first ones, after all; the first ones off the assembly line, untainted by all those things that pollute our own cultural surroundings and leach their way into our brains, influencing our decisions. They have nothing, no one to blame for their actions, no just cause that a skilled defense attorney could use to prove just cause or reasonable doubt. They simply, blatantly did the wrong thing—and they know it!
If they had had some reason, some justification for their rule breaking, they wouldn’t have high-tailed it out of sight at the sound of the leaves rustling in the evening breeze, scared that every noise was God approaching. Of course, when God does calls out looking for the man, the man answers God. God asks why the man is hiding, “because I was naked,” he says. He was naked, and upon eating the fruit he became aware of his nakedness. I suppose there may be something there about being ashamed of our bodies, something about the ways we objectify naked bodies, thus making them somehow shameful (of course, I’ve been sitting on the couch when my three-year-old comes streaking through the house as happy and unashamed as anything), but the reality is that the man’s nakedness is a sign of his vulnerability, no longer able to hide from God what he’s done. He’s exposed, and God sees him and knows exactly what he’s done: "Who told you that you were naked? Have you eaten from the tree of which I commanded you not to eat?" The jig is up! God knows what has happened, so the only thing left to do now is come clean, right?
Have you ever noticed just what happens, though, when God confronts the man? God says, "Who told you that you were naked? Have you eaten from the tree of which I commanded you not to eat?" and how does the man answer? “The woman whom you gave to be with me…” At first, it’s sort of funny: Adam is questioned by God, so he blames “the woman,” but then I think about all of those women and girls who’ve been assaulted and how so many callous, ignorant people (mostly men) respond by saying something like, “Well, if she hadn’t been wearing those clothes…she was probably asking for it the way she was acting…” Even now, in the wake of revelations about Paige Patterson (former president of Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary in Ft. Worth) and the way he ignored reports of rape and his misogynistic beliefs and attitudes, there are some who are rushing to his defense, pointing fingers at the women who are raising these allegations. It seems as if it’s been in place since the beginning of time: when a man fails, blame a woman. That’s how Adam responds: “The woman…it was her fault, she gave me fruit from the tree, and I ate.”
He passes the buck—the easy buck—to the woman, his wife. He puts the blame on her, because he thinks it’s easier to shift blame than admit fault, to push the accusation on down the line, because that’s what we do, isn’t it? Whenever we’re caught, whenever the whole thing starts to come unglued, we look for someone—anyone else—to pin it on. We’re like two kids playing in the living room when the lamp from the end table crashes to the floor; it’s anybody’s fault but ours! I suppose we pass the blame hoping we’ll pass the punishment on with it. Maybe that’s what Adam thought, but did you notice what else he says? “The woman whom you gave to be with me…” Maybe it’s not the woman’s fault after all. Maybe it’s God’s fault! Yeah! It’s God’s fault! After all, if God hadn’t given the man the woman in the first place, she would have never been tempted to take the fruit and he would have never been an accomplice in her iniquity. Yeah, it’s God’s fault. It’s God’s fault for putting the fruit there in the first place. It’s God’s fault for giving us the freedom of will to choose. It’s God’s fault for sticking us with inadequate help, for giving us a desire to please people, for creating a nearly perfect world and lacing it with just a touch of chaos. It’s God’s fault!
Of course, we don’t blame God when things go wrong, do we? When we don’t get the job—again, when the stove quits right after the car blows a head gasket, when the principal calls (again) after our son has been in another fight, when we fall off the wagon and find ourselves waiting outside the package store before the manager opens the door…it’s not our fault. It’s got nothing to do with me. If God would stop picking on me, if God would just help me, if God would just send someone to give me a hand up…It’s not my fault. I mean, really, it’s sort of on God, right?
“The woman whom you gave to be with me,” that’s what the man says when God confronts him. I suppose God could have just called the man out on the carpet, revealed to him that God knows what’s really going on, but as the story goes, “Then the Lord God said to the woman, ‘What is this that you have done?’" I’ve got to be honest with you: I’m not wild about God’s tone to the woman—at least not how I read it at first. "What is this that you have done?" almost sounds like God is taking the man’s side (and maybe to the Ancient Near Eastern tellers of this story, God was). I like to think, however, that God’s tone is a bit more inquiring than accusative. "What is this that you have done?" God asks, as if to hear her side of the story, not take the man’s blame as gospel.
Now, here’s the woman’s turn to come clean, to outshine the man in her honesty, to stop the flow of finger-pointing and just lay it all out there for God (as if God doesn’t know!). But what does the woman do? What does she say? "The serpent tricked me, and I ate." “It was the snake’s fault! He tricked me!” She has the opportunity to own up to her failure, but instead, she passes the buck on down the line to the snake. Now, the ancient Hebrews had no intention of this snake being what we know of as the devil, but it’s a commonplace phrase in our culture, that whenever we do something we know to be wrong, whenever we give in to temptation, whenever we cross that line, what do we say? “The devil made me do it!” It’s not my fault; it’s this old world and all that’s wring with it. It’s not my fault; I’ve been too deeply corrupted by advertising, video games, violent movies, a bad childhood…it’s not my fault.
Now, don’t misunderstand what I’m saying here: social, biological, and familial influences are most definitely at work in and around us, and there are many times when we may too easily dismiss their effects on the thoughts and actions of those who create chaos in our world. But when we use such things as a crutch, when we avoid the real cause of our hurt, our pain, our addictions, when we point fingers at our parents or our culture, we are seeking to shift the blame away from ourselves and onto that for which we feel no responsibility. We say to ourselves, “It’s not my fault they don’t have anything to eat…it’s not my fault they’re sleeping on the street…it’s not my fault that the jail’s overflowing, the school’s crumbling, and the stores are closing. That’s got nothing to do with me.”
"The woman whom you gave to be with me…The serpent tricked me..." “It’s not my fault,” they said when God asked what was going on in the garden. They pass the blame all the way down to the snake, and the snake is the first one to catch the curse from God: “Because you have done this, cursed are you among all animals and among all wild creatures…” Of course, the curses don’t end with the snake and our text this morning. God goes on in verses sixteen through nineteen: “To the woman he said, ‘I will greatly increase your pangs in childbearing…yet your desire shall be for your husband, and he shall rule over you.’ And to the man he said…’cursed is the ground because of you; in toil you shall eat of it all the days of your life…By the sweat of your face you shall eat bread until you return to the ground, for out of it you were taken; you are dust, and to dust you shall return.’" They broke the only rule God gave them, so the punishment, the curses come next. These first people, created directly by God, messed up. These first people, created by God, surrounded by paradise, failed. These first people, created by God, surrounded by paradise, free from all that pulls at us, all that weighs us down, free from all the baggage each and every one of us lugs around on our shoulders each and every day, there first people with only one prohibition from God, miss the mark; they sin.
You and I, we actually have a cause and a right to some of the excuses, the reasons at the heart of Adam and Eve’s responses to God; we have all sorts of snakes hissing in our ears, all sorts of confusing voices speaking into our hearts, distracting us; you and I, we have way more than just one prohibition, one rule set before us (even if we made such rules ourselves), but these two—these two should be the last ones to ever be guilty, yet here we are, in Genesis, with these two, naked and ashamed, guilty of sin. If I had been God, if it had been me finding them cowering in the trees, trying to hide from me, that would have been the end of it: “You had one rule! ONE! And you broke it!” I’m not sure I would have bothered with curses; I may have just boxed the whole thing up and set it on the curb for the trash truck to pick up…
But God doesn’t do that.
Sure, there are curses. There are always consequences to our actions. Whether they are just, right, or even from God, there are always actions. Sure, there are feelings of shame, especially when it’s not the first time, especially when we have to make that phone call, when we have to say it out loud, when we have to confess what we’ve done, that we need help, that we’ve fractured some relationship. Sure, we’ll not want to own up to it; we’ll look everywhere for someone else to blame, for someone else to curse, for some set of circumstances on which to pin our problems. But no matter what it is we’ve done, no matter if it really is the fault of our parents, the culture, medication, or just some malicious acquaintances, no matter how severe we find the consequences to be, God doesn’t leave us.
I suppose that’s the hope I find in a story that can otherwise be too easily read and dismissed as a story about how sin entered the world. Maybe that’s fair; after all, it does tell about the first time humankind broke God’s commandment. But maybe—just maybe—this is a story about the first time God showed grace. After all, God could have just ground them back into the dust from which they came and started over. I suppose God could have banished them to some unseen, dark corner of creation, away from God, forever. Perhaps God could have simply flicked them off the face of the earth, wiping the slate clean to try a new set of humans, an Adam and Eve 2.0, but God doesn’t do that. God’s more than a bit stubborn when it comes to grace. God stays with the man and the woman—and God never leaves them!
Maybe you’re here today thinking God has already left you, that you’ve messed up one too many times to really still be one of God’s children. I’m here to tell you, God isn’t like that. God doesn’t leave you; God’s grace is stubborn that way. Or maybe you’re here and you think that there are those people who are surely outside of God’s grace, too sinful to truly be cared for by God. I’m here to tell you, God isn’t like that. If God stuck it out with two humans who literally had the world handed to them, if God stuck it out with two humans who sought to blame everyone but themselves for their failures, if God stuck it out with people who time after time blatantly broke the covenant God had with them, if God could look down from the cross as those who drove the nails and say, “forgive them,” then God can stick it out with you and whatever junk you’ve got with you! Amen.

"Lord of Sabbath" (Second Sunday after Pentecost)


Mark 2:23-3:6
3:1 Again he entered the synagogue, and a man was there who had a withered hand. 2 They watched him to see whether he would cure him on the sabbath, so that they might accuse him. 3 And he said to the man who had the withered hand, “Come forward.” 4 Then he said to them, “Is it lawful to do good or to do harm on the sabbath, to save life or to kill?” But they were silent. 5 He looked around at them with anger; he was grieved at their hardness of heart and said to the man, “Stretch out your hand.” He stretched it out, and his hand was restored. 6 The Pharisees went out and immediately conspired with the Herodians against him, how to destroy him.

Have you ever played a board game or a card game with one of those people? You know the ones I’m talking about. You’re playing Scrabble, and you lay down the word “xerox” (which, let’s be honest, should win the game because that word has not one, but two “x’s”). Two of your friends are amazed, astonished really, by your mastery of the English alphabet, but that one friend (usually the one who just lost the lead to you) speaks up and says, “Actually, I hate to burst your bubble, but xerox is a proper noun, and according to the ‘official’ rules of Scrabble, you cannot play a proper noun.” Then this “friend” reaches out, picks up your tiles one by one—making sure to slowly pick up the last “x”—and hands them back to you, smirking the entire time. We all have those friends, and if you don’t, there’s a good chance you are that friend.
I suppose there’s a place for those strict rule-followers, for those who like to quote the rulebook, especially in times of confusion, when the outcome is a bit too close, when a questionable card is played, when (and this seems to be the case most often) the lead changes to someone else. I suppose there’s a place for rules, parameters that are set in order to make sure things are fair, that the playing field is level. My experience, however, has been that once someone starts constantly quoting the rules, once someone starts calling out every infringement of proper protocol and procedure, all the joy leaves, and you’re just left wondering when it’s all going to be over, so you can go back to doing what games were meant for in the first place—having fun and enjoying time with friends. After all, what joy is there, really, in pointing out everyone else’s mistakes?
At first reading, some might think these Pharisees are up to this very act—pointing out everyone else’s mistakes, citing the rulebook—especially when someone else seems to be taking the lead, and that someone else is this rabble-rousing rabbi from Nazareth named Jesus. We’ve heard it at least a hundred times (those of us who’ve hung around church long enough): “the Pharisees were concerned about the Law, but Jesus was all about grace.” Well, that’s partially true, I guess. The Pharisees were concerned about the Law, which for them included the actual Hebrew Scriptures and the oral traditions surrounding them. That’s why they confront Jesus in verse 24: “Look, why are they doing what is not lawful on the sabbath?” Now, lest there be any confusion, the unlawful thing they are doing is not stealing grain as they are traveling through someone else’s grain fields. No, the law the Pharisees accuse them of breaking is the fourth (or third if you’re counting with your Catholic or Lutheran friends[1]) commandment: “Remember the Sabbath and keep it holy.” By this time, that commandment had been explained and expanded to include a rather exhaustive list of activities, actions, movements, and events which were all prohibited on the Sabbath as they may have been understood as work, and therefore, if one were to participate in such actions one would be in violation of “remembering the Sabbath and keeping it holy.” Traveling and gleaning grain were both prohibited activities, so the Pharisees are accusing Jesus and his disciples of not honoring the Sabbath, of breaking the fourth commandment.
Of course, Jesus is quick to point out that sometimes it is necessary to bend the rules a bit, especially in the service of God. He cites a story from 1 Samuel 21:1-6 (though he, or Mark, or somebody gets the name of the priest wrong—it’s Ahimelek not Abiathar who was serving as high priest), a story about how David “ate the bread of the Presence, which it is not lawful for any but the priests to eat, and he gave some to his companions.” While this story isn’t explicitly about breaking the Sabbath, it is an example of how even the most sacrosanct laws must sometimes be broken in light of a greater purpose, a greater good. Really, though, the point Jesus is trying to make here is that laws were meant for human beings, meant to guide us, direct us, keep us inline with God’s greater purpose; they are not meant to be weaponized, used as a method of measuring ourselves over against the failures of others. Jesus says, “The sabbath was made for humankind, and not humankind for the sabbath; so the Son of Man is lord even of the sabbath.” In other words, “stop thinking that the sabbath, the Law in general, precedes the very existence of humankind, of you, your neighbor, and everyone else; it doesn’t, and Jesus is lord even of those laws you cling to in order to find some measure of righteousness.”
This isn’t the last time Jesus is accused of breaking the Sabbath, though; chapter three picks up with this scene (perhaps on the same day or a different Sabbath) of Jesus entering a synagogue when a man with a withered hand approaches him. Mark tells us, “They watched him to see whether he would cure him on the sabbath, so that they might accuse him.” Now, I know this is Jesus, and I know these are the Pharisees, and I know this is part of Mark’s narrative taking us to Christ’s crucifixion, but I cannot help but recognize the timeless tendency of so many self-proclaimed righteous folks in these Mark describes in verse two of chapter three: “They watched him…so that they might accuse him.” You know, I have found it to be true that whenever you go looking for something, you generally find it. Whether you’re looking for something to complain about at work, at school, or at church, whether you’re looking for that fault in a friend so you can justify your jealousy, or whether you’re looking for someone to let you down, you’ll always find what you’re looking for, and these folks found what they were looking for with Jesus, something to pin on him, healing on the Sabbath.   
Now, it might sound strange that healing was forbidden on the Sabbath, but keep in mind that this particular healing wasn’t an emergency—this man had likely suffered with his withered hand for some time, and keep in mind that the Sabbath is over at sundown, so Jesus could have likely waited until sunset and restored this man’s hand, but he didn’t. Jesus healed him (though perhaps in a passive sort of way) on the spot, right then and there, on the Sabbath! Jesus knew what they were looking for, and he gave it to them. But why? Why not stay within the law and wait for the sun to go down; it could wait, right? Why purposely provoke the anger of the Pharisees? Sure, some might say this is all part of the plan, part of setting the wheels in motion. After all, Mark says, that after all this “The Pharisees went out and immediately conspired with the Herodians against him, how to destroy him.” If Jesus had just followed the rules, remembered his Bible verses, recited the Ten Commandments, if he had just waited a little while longer, he still would have been able to miraculously restore the man’s hand, and he would have been well within the limits of the law. But he didn’t! In fact, it’s almost like Jesus is trying to show them something, trying to teach us something bigger, something deeper with his actions in that synagogue on that Sabbath. It’s almost as if there’s some great lesson in the silence of the Pharisees after Jesus asks, “Is it lawful to do good or to do harm on the sabbath, to save life or to kill?” Could it be that Jesus is trying to teach them—trying to teach us—that there is something greater, something far beyond a righteousness found in following all the rules?
I think it’s too simple an answer to say that Jesus is throwing out all the old ways, all the old laws, in favor of unconditional grace. I think it’s too simple, and I think it’s wrong—not because I think that Jesus didn’t preach, teach, and show us what unconditional grace looks like, but because I don’t think that’s what all those laws were—conditions. No, I think, like so many of the good gifts we receive from God, they were initially acts of mercy and love, ways to show God’s people a path to living as God’s people in relation to one another and the rest of the world, but as we so often do, we can twist those good gifts and morph them into something they were never meant to be. The commandment concerning the Sabbath was a commandment meant to call the hearts and minds of God’s people back to their bondage in Egypt, to remember that they had once been foreigners, slaves, outsiders forced into a system of oppression and dehumanizing existence. It was a commandment meant to remind God’s people that everyone created in God’s image deserves to be recognized as such and in doing so, rest from their labor at least one day a week. But these Pharisees had warped the commandment into some sort of sin accounting measure, a way of heaping guilt on those who have to travel and glean grain to eat on the Sabbath, a way of looking down their nose that those folks who punch the clock on Sundays or cut their grass after church or eat lunch out after the service. “Remember the Sabbath and keep it holy” was never about does and don’ts for Saturdays or Sundays; it was about God and God’s love and grace for people.
You see, I’m growing more and more convinced that what Jesus was doing—what Jesus is still doing—is calling us to see that there is so much more to God than what we’ve come up with in our religions. I’m becoming more and more convinced that what Jesus was up to was showing us that our feeble attempts at keeping score are futile, little more than thinly disguised fears. Because that’s really what’s at the heart of all legalistic attempts at controlling God and God’s people: fear. Misinterpretations of Sabbath, the Law, the Bible, doctrine, traditions—all these things are simply tethers that keep us linked to our own fear, fear that forgiveness isn’t enough, that grace isn’t enough, that compassion isn’t enough, that love isn’t enough. But Jesus is calling us—showing us—that forgiveness is enough, that grace is enough, that compassion is enough, and above all else, love is enough, and it’s enough to save us—ALL of us. It’s enough to bring God’s kingdom on earth as it is in heaven. It’s enough to warrant an apparent breaking of the Sabbath to heal a man’s withered hand, because the inbreaking of God’s kingdom of love won’t wait for the sun to set—it can’t wait until things are right and proper on our timetable. The Lord of the Sabbath sets the pace, and his pace is one of relentless, limitless, unconditional love, and you can’t hold that back on the Sabbath. You can’t hold that back from anyone, no matter who they are, what they are, what they do, or what they don’t do. The Lord of the Sabbath isn’t waiting on the time to be right, the conditions to be right, for our hearts to be right: he loves us anyway. Jesus loves us—each and every one of us—even if it looks like it goes against the law, against tradition, against our self-satisfying interpretations of scripture. Jesus loves us anyway, whether we keep to all the rules or break every, single one of them. Jesus loves us anyway, and that love is more than enough. Amen.  


[1] The Catholic Catechism and Luther’s Large Catechism combine the abstention from other gods and the making of graven images as one, single commandments, therefore making the keeping of Sabbath the third commandment. 

"Breath in Dry Bones" (Pentecost)


Ezekiel 37:1-14
1 The hand of the Lord came upon me, and he brought me out by the spirit of the Lord and set me down in the middle of a valley; it was full of bones. 2 He led me all around them; there were very many lying in the valley, and they were very dry. 3 He said to me, "Mortal, can these bones live?" I answered, "O Lord God, you know." 4 Then he said to me, "Prophesy to these bones, and say to them: O dry bones, hear the word of the Lord. 5 Thus says the Lord God to these bones: I will cause breath to enter you, and you shall live. 6 I will lay sinews on you, and will cause flesh to come upon you, and cover you with skin, and put breath in you, and you shall live; and you shall know that I am the Lord." 7 So I prophesied as I had been commanded; and as I prophesied, suddenly there was a noise, a rattling, and the bones came together, bone to its bone. 8 I looked, and there were sinews on them, and flesh had come upon them, and skin had covered them; but there was no breath in them. 9 Then he said to me, "Prophesy to the breath, prophesy, mortal, and say to the breath: Thus says the Lord God: Come from the four winds, O breath, and breathe upon these slain, that they may live." 10 I prophesied as he commanded me, and the breath came into them, and they lived, and stood on their feet, a vast multitude. 11 Then he said to me, "Mortal, these bones are the whole house of Israel. They say, "Our bones are dried up, and our hope is lost; we are cut off completely.' 12 Therefore prophesy, and say to them, Thus says the Lord God: I am going to open your graves, and bring you up from your graves, O my people; and I will bring you back to the land of Israel. 13 And you shall know that I am the Lord, when I open your graves, and bring you up from your graves, O my people. 14 I will put my spirit within you, and you shall live, and I will place you on your own soil; then you shall know that I, the Lord, have spoken and will act, says the Lord."

In his ancient epic, Works and Days, the Greek poet Hesiod tells of the creation of the first woman. She was formed from the earth by the gods on Mount Olympus as a punishment to men…I’ll give you a moment to process that notion…and she was endowed with gifts from each of the gods: Athena clothed her in a silvery gown; Aphrodite gave her grace and desires; Hermes gave her a deceitful disposition and the power of speech, and he gave her a name, Pandora, which means “all-gifted,” since she had been gifted by all the gods of Olympus.[1]
When Pandora was sent to Epimetheus as a bride, Zeus gave her a jar as a wedding present. She didn’t know what was in the jar, so when her curiosity overtook her, she opened the jar, and from it sprang all manner of cruel spirits, plagues, and demons into the world—this was the gods’ true punishment for the insubordination of men. Pandora sealed the jar just in time to capture one final spirit, elpis, which is hope. Hope was what Pandora held in the box; hope remained as the singular comfort for the now evil-plagued world. Hope remained, yet while it may have been kept quietly in Pandora’s jar I can’t help but notice how elusive hope can be for the rest of us, how hard it can be to find hope when we need it.
When the doctor says malignant, aggressive, six months left…how do you find hope after that? When you hear rumors about downsizing, budget cuts, pink slips, and start thinking about the unemployment line…how do you find hope after that? When the arguing seems constant, when the distance grows, there’s separation, and pretty soon you have to sign the papers with the word “divorce” typed so clearly…how do you find hope after that? When the attacks start, the bombs blast, war and all of its evils rage, and the title terrorist is tossed about…how do you find hope after that?
Of course, hope doesn’t seem to be absent only after the great tragedies of life. Think about it: you get the promotion, win the award, graduate at the top of the class, secure the victory, make it to a comfortable retirement, but then the shine wears off the apple, and the desire for more—more meaning, more purpose, more life—takes hold, but it seems there’s nothing left for you to do, not higher rung on the ladder…how do you find hope after that? After the battle is over, after the destruction, the bondage, the exile and death, after settling in to the ruts determined to be fate…how do you find hope? Where do you find hope?
We find the prophet Ezekiel faced with that heavy question in the story before us this morning—perhaps the most well-known story from Ezekiel. He has a vision, a vision much like others the prophet has had, in which the hand of the Lord takes him out to a valley, a plain, and shows him something. In this case, God shows Ezekiel a valley filled with bones, dry, bleached-by-the-sun bones. Ezekiel is led all around them, back-and-forth over the pile of bones, as if he’s to inspect them, to make sure there’s nothing stirring in the great, dry pile. Then, God asks him, "Mortal, can these bones live?" What kind of question is that? It’d be like asking the one sitting across from you at Cooter Brown’s after eating a full slab of dry-rubbed ribs, “Hey, do you think that pig can oink?” “Can these bones live?" Then again, if we consider the one who’s asking the question, maybe it isn’t so crazy a thought, but it seems outside the realm of possibility, like it wouldn’t make sense for the bones to live again. After all, resuscitation is not unheard of in the Hebrew Scriptures; dead bodies have come back to life. But bones, very dry bones…?
It’s one thing to know that bones left to dry and dissolve in the desert can live, and it’s one thing to know that God is God and has brought life from the dust at least once before, but to really believe that bones can live, to really believe that the expiration date has yet to pass on a body’s ability to be resuscitated…I don’t know…I can understand why Ezekiel (wise prophet he was) responded to God’s question the way he did: "O Lord God, you know." It’s as if Ezekiel didn’t want to own up to his own doubts, his own certainties about the metaphysical universe and the laws which governed it, so one can almost see him shrug his shoulders, look down at the dry, parched earth as he shuffles his feet, as he says, "O Lord God, you know."
We do that too, don’t we? God asks us, “Do you think this can happen? Do you think it’s possible? How can it happen?” And we look at ourselves, at the world around us, at the knowledge we have and resources we possess, and with a mumble we say "O Lord God, you know." We don’t want out doubts to show, our doubts that what seems impossible is just that—impossible. We don’t want our certainties about the ways of the world, the ways of our comfort, to be subject to the mystery and uncertainty of God. So we just sort of hand it off to God: “You know I suppose Lord, so why don’t you show me.” We put it on God to prove God’s self to us, to show us whether or not the impossible really is possible, that way our anxiety can stay at a minimum, and if God should prove to do the impossible, then we’ll really have a story to tell. But that’s not the way God seems to operate, especially when it comes to those of us called prophets.
Did you notice that, after God asks Ezekiel if the bones could live and after Ezekiel responds, God doesn’t react with any kind of “Well, stand back and watch this!”? Did you notice that? God doesn’t strike the sands with a bolt of lightning from the sky; there’s no divine utterance as in the book of Genesis; God doesn’t say, “let there be life in them there bones!” and the bones spring to life like dancing skeletons from some old black and white cartoon. There’s none of that. No, God doesn’t command the bones to do anything—he commands the prophet to prophesy. God tells Ezekiel, “Prophesy to these bones, and say to them: O dry bones, hear the word of the Lord. Thus says the Lord God to these bones: I will cause breath to enter you, and you shall live. I will lay sinews on you, and will cause flesh to come upon you, and cover you with skin, and put breath in you, and you shall live; and you shall know that I am the Lord." Then there was a strange sound, the sound of bones shaking from the ground and coming together, “a rattling, and the bones came together, bone to its bone…and there were sinews on them, and flesh had come upon them, and skin had covered them; but there was no breath in them.”
It appears that the dry bones can live again as they come together and now lie on the valley floor as cluttered corpses rather than a pile of bones. But something isn’t quite right; something is still missing. God commands Ezekiel to prophesy to the wind, to pray to the Spirit, to enter into these corpses, and after the prophet does so, breath comes into the bodies. They rise to stand on their feet as a great multitude—an army. What was once dead, decomposed, dry, now stands alive, breathing, on its feet. A pile of bones, bleached by the sun, once hopeless, again inhales and exhales as a great multitude. This is isn’t the reviving of a once-sick child; this isn’t the resuscitation of a recently departed brother; this is the impossible made possible! This is hope where there once was only death! And though it is only a vision, a vision explained to the prophet as what God will do for the entire house of Israel, it is a powerful vision of what God can do.
Now, don’t misunderstand me: I’m not saying that Ezekiel’s vision is a point-for-point testimony of God’s ability to slap muscle, tendons, and skin on an old skeleton and make it a living, breathing person again. No. What I’m saying is this: nothing is impossible with God. That’s nothing new to most of us, but what might startle us, what might strike fear into the deepest parts of our being, what will test the simple one-liners of our faith is this: God doesn’t have to prove to us that nothing is impossible, but faith, our faith, means proving to ourselves that we actually believe what we say we believe. It’s one thing to say that nothing is impossible with God, but to then look out on the valley of very dry bones and believe they can live again, to live among an exiled people and believe they’ll be freed, to witness a divided nation and trust it can be put back together and made whole, to sit in an upper room and wait for something to happen after the resurrected Lord has ascended to the Father, to stare into the empty cupboard as your child’s stomach growls louder and believe you’ll have dinner on the table, see someone you disagree with as a friend, to behold a sinner as a saint, to look in the mirror and actually believe God loves you…that’s another thing altogether isn’t it? That’s when hope becomes palpable, when it’s fleshed out and filled with the breath of the Holy Spirit.
It’s easy to say we believe “nothing is impossible with God,” or “God so loved the world,” or “I can do all things through Christ,” or “God does not show partiality,” or “Jesus loves me this I know…” But to prove it, to prove it to ourselves, that requires bold action, selfless trust, and above all else, it requires we do something besides shrugging our shoulders and saying, “O Lord God, you know." It means our faith isn’t simply a list of things with which we either agree or disagree. It means if we really believe all the things we say we believe about God, about Jesus, about salvation, about life, about the Church, about love—if we really believe those things, then we ought to prove it! And let me tell you something, saying it over and over, louder and louder, that doesn’t prove anything.
To say we trust God, that we have hope, and yet cross our fingers, hedge our bets, and store away enough to survive World War III…that’s not trust. To say our works don’t save us, that our deeds and “clean living” won’t earn God’s love, and then try to find every way we are better than someone else…that’s not faith, that’s not hope. To say we believe that nothing can separate us from the love of God, that God loves everybody, and then shut the door in the faces of those whom a religious society has pushed to the margins…that’s not love, that’s not God. Like Ezekiel, you and I are commanded to prove our faith to ourselves—God doesn’t need to prove God’s self to us, and God doesn’t need proof from us, but we need to prove it to ourselves and to others, so that they might have that same faith. Like Ezekiel, we aren’t called to just believe dry bones can live again; we’re called to take part in the power that revives them!
So I ask you today, as we’ve gathered around the Lord’s Table on this Pentecost Sunday, as we proclaim together our belief in the love of Jesus, as we remember the power of God to breathe life back into dry bones and raise up a crucified Christ, as we celebrate the coming of the Holy Spirit and the birth of the Church, as we collectively claim our faith in God, do you really believe all that you say you believe? Well…prove it. Amen.


[1] You can find an overview of the Pandora myth here: http://www.theoi.com/Heroine/Pandora.html

"The Testimony of God" (Seventh Sunday of Easter)


1 John 5:9-13

              Testimonies. I suppose many of you have been around church long enough to have heard one or two folks give their testimony. For those who may be otherwise unaware, when someone “gives their testimony” it is usually an autobiographical account of how he or she became a person of faith. Now, I’ve heard more than a few folks give their testimony, and it’s been my experience that they tend to fall into one of three, general categories. First, there are those testimonies that follow a narrative that goes something like this: “I was an awful person my entire life; I was a drunk since the age of twelve, had a three pack a day habit since I was nine, spent the night in jail for robbing a Chevron when I was fourteen, and got put on probation for punching my middle school math teacher. But then I heard a television preacher one night, and it was like he was talking to me, so I got saved, and now my life is a gravy train with biscuit wheels: I’m married, got three nice kids, a house, and two paid-for cars. Hallelujah! Ain’t God good?!” That’s one sort of testimony.
              The second sort of testimony is usually a lot milder. It goes something like this: “I’ve gone to church every day of my life (and for about nine months prior to birth). I could sing every VBS theme song by heart, got gold stars every week in Sunday school for memorizing my Bible verses, and even sang in the children’s choir, but I knew that I wasn’t saved because I hadn’t said the “Sinner’s prayer” or walked the aisle to be baptized and join the church, so I did that when I was seven, and I’ve been a good Christian ever since.”
              The third type falls somewhere in the middle I guess. They go something like this: “Well, I wasn’t a bad person, but I knew something was missing in my life. I lost my job…my dog died…my car was repossessed…I didn’t get approved for a mortgage, and I found myself looking for an answer to what may be missing or out of place in my life. That’s when a friend invited me to church…I got involved, accepted Christ, and I’ve been a part of the church ever since.”
              Now, I don’t mean to make light of anyone’s story—in fact, I think our stories are our most valuable resources as human beings and especially as people of faith. I do, however, think we’re living in an era when our stories do not carry the weight they once did; we’re living in a time marked perhaps most deeply by an overwhelming sense of skepticism and the desire to just find out whose side someone is on. I’m afraid we’re not nearly as interested in each other’s stories as we are interested in where we all stand on this or that issue; we are more concerned about what folks believe than trying to hear and understand the journey that brought them to that belief. Maybe that’s why folks don’t like to tell their stories as much anymore, why they don’t like to “give their testimony.” I mean, I know I’m not the only one who has stumbled upon those shows on television (maybe late at night after the batteries in the remote have died) where a woman is talking into a microphone about how she prayed to God for a miracle and after “sowing a seed” of one thousand dollars into some preacher’s ministry she got a mysterious check in the mail for $10,000, and after hearing three more stories like it, you mumble under your breath, “Yeah right!” as you change the channel. I know; I’ve been there too; it’s hard to believe folks these days when they tell you something.
              Like the time Anthony interrupted choir practice one evening, looking for the pastor. He came in my office and told me all about how his car was broken down just down the street, and all he needed was a $30 belt from the parts store and he’d be back on the road. When I asked him what kind of car he drove, he had to think about it before he told me it was a Jeep, and when I asked him what kind of belt, he stuttered a bit before he said, “a fan belt,” and when I offered to drive him to the parts store, buy the belt for him, and install it, he decided he didn’t need the belt (or the $30) anymore. It’s hard to believe folks and their stories these days. It doesn’t matter if they’re telling you a sob story in the gas station parking lot, trying to sell you a used Hyundai, or telling you all about the ways God has blessed them, it’s hard to believe people’s stories, their testimonies, because we’ve been burned one too many times, because we’re being programmed to be suspicious and skeptical.
              Maybe that’s why there is some comfort in the first words of the text we’ve heard this morning: “If we receive human testimony, the testimony of God is greater.” Maybe another way to say that is, “if you’re a bit skeptical about the testimony of others, God’s testimony is better and able to be trusted.” But what exactly does the author of this letter mean when he says, “the testimony of God?” Does God have a past of which we are unaware? Did God have a “Damascus Road Experience?” What is the testimony of God? Maybe there’s more than one way to go about answering that question.
              I suppose one might be tempted to take what one might call a biblical approach to answering that question and say something like, “Well, the Bible is the testimony of God; after all, we call it the word of God don’t we?” Is the Bible the testimony of God? If it is, there may be more than just a few holes in it, at least in the eyes of those outside of the faith. I mean, if the Bible is the testimony of God, what do we do with all those places that either don’t make sense, contradict each other, or paint a picture of a God that inconsequently slaughters thousands of men, women, children, and animals just because they were already living on some land? If the Bible is the whole of God’s testimony, then what do we do about those places, those stories in Scripture like Hosea where God seems to approve of spousal abuse as a way to teach his people a lesson? I have to tell you, while I love the Bible and take it far too seriously to take it literally, I can’t quite get settled with the entirety of the book as God’s testimony—at least not God’s only testimony.
              Perhaps there’s a more historical way to think about God’s testimony. Maybe if we were to trace God’s covenants with God’s people through the Hebrew Scriptures of the Old Testament we might find a more satisfactory way of thinking about God’s testimony. Maybe God’s testimony is found in God’s covenant with Abraham, in God’s promise to preserve Abraham’s people. Maybe…but if that’s the case, God’s going to have some explaining to do about all that persecution, about the Holocaust, about the many ways that innocent people, descendants of Abraham, have suffered needlessly at the hands of others in the world. You know, when it comes down to it, if God’s testimony is found in the way God has covenanted with people down through the centuries it’s not a very strong testimony. I mean, either God chooses some really sorry people who never get it right and are always being corrected, or God simply doesn’t live up to God’s end of the contract as time after time the people are pulled back and forth across their land and their very humanity. So, maybe God’s testimony isn’t necessarily found in the history of God’s relationship with God’s people.
              Of course, phrases like “the testimony of God” lend themselves to a great deal of pondering among the giant, theological minds of the Church. Perhaps God’s testimony is to be understood doctrinally, as in God’s testimony is something found in the complex ideas of God’s substance in relation to the salvific work…I almost put myself to sleep thinking about such things!
              To tell the truth, I think the testimony of God is a fuller, more complete version of those kinds of testimonies that stick with us, those kinds of testimonies that are not told in three acts, the kind that are written down, shared from the pulpit, or told in a Lifetime made-for-tv movie. No, God’s testimony is found in flesh and bone and blood—in the very presence of Jesus. Now, hear what I’m about to say: I don’t necessarily mean that God’s testimony is found in the historical accounts of Jesus’ life and ministry; I’m not even saying that God’s testimony is found in the retelling of Jesus’ death and resurrection. After all, if Jesus was raised a hundred times it doesn’t mean a thing unless it does something to you, unless it changes something deep down inside of you. So, what I mean by God’s testimony is found in the very presence of Jesus, is that God’s testimony is found…in you! It’s a bit of a worn-out expression, but it’s true: the only Jesus some folks will ever meet is you. You are God’s testimony, and I know this because I’ve experienced the testimony of God firsthand—not by sitting in a pew and listening to someone tell me their story, but by the countless, small, big, and sometimes hidden ways that Christ has been shown to me through others.
              Like the way I used to walk to my mailbox every day before lunch in college, and at least once a week there’d be a small envelope with the return address marked “County Road 625, Enterprise, AL 36330.” Every week I received a note from Ann Arrington, the organist at my home church. There wasn’t much to the note usually, just a word about how things were going at church, how her sister Rachel was doing, or how long her brother Franky had been gone riding his mule. I’ve kept most of those notes because for me, their part of God’s testimony.
              I think about the woman who sat on the other side of the sanctuary in that church, Freda Jones (I sometimes called her “Aunt Freda”). She was my eighth grade Algebra teacher; I played baseball with two of her sons, and she graduated high school with my dad, so she knew a thing or two about me and the kind of people I came from. She was my first real Sunday school teacher, but the way she taught me how to quietly love and care about folks is a part of the testimony of God for me. Every time I’d visit back home, even after I was married, in seminary, and working in a church, Aunt Freda would find me after church, give me a big hug, and slip a twenty-dollar bill in my hand. The last time she did that I said, “Aunt Freda I’m grown now. I don’t need this.” She said, “Hush and use it to take Sallie to lunch.” That’s part of the testimony of God.
              I think of all of those people in my own life who’ve gone out of their way to show me they care about me, those people who’ve listened to my story and still care enough to hang around, those people who secretly hold the weight of other people’s worlds on their shoulders and still carry on with a joy and a love that can only come from some source beyond themselves.
              You see, God’s testimony isn’t found in words, because words will fail, they will let us down, they’ll be forgotten. But life, love, flesh, bone, and blood…that sticks with you. I’m convinced that God could have ripped open the sky, made the earth stop spinning, and spoke from heaven in a booming, powerful voice for every man, woman, and child to hear, but it wouldn’t have stuck. God could’ve reached down his hand and tapped us all on the shoulder, whispered in our ears and said, “I’m here. I’m real. Believe me,” and we’d all carry on as if nothing had happened in a few weeks. Instead, God came among us. Instead, God chose to show us—not tell us—God’s reckless, eternal love for us. God’s testimony is found in God’s son Jesus, in the way Jesus lives on in you and me. So, have you heard God’s testimony in your own life? Will you be God’s testimony for someone else today? Amen.

"When Easter's Over" (Second Sunday of Easter)


Acts 4:32-35


What do you do with Easter when it’s over? Of course, Easter isn’t technically over: Easter is a season that begins with the Resurrection of the Lord and winds up 50 days later with Pentecost, but still, for most folks, Easter was only last Sunday. It’s over, so what do you do with Easter when it’s over? I mean, it’s not like Thanksgiving, right? When Thanksgiving is over, you put it in a Tupperware container and stick it on a shelf in the refrigerator. When Thanksgiving is over, you can wrap it in aluminum foil or make a week’s worth of turkey sandwiches out of it, maybe have chicken and dressing with green bean casserole a few nights for dinner. You sweep up the crumbs, put away the dishes, and start planning for the next football game. That’s what you do when Thanksgiving is over, but what do you do with Easter when it’s over?
It’d be nice if it was more like Christmas. When Christmas is over you take it down and box it up. Sure, there’s some variation on exactly when Christmas is over. For some, it may be as soon as the last kid unwraps the last present and they all fall asleep on the floor about 9:00 A.M. Christmas morning. I know my mom always talked about waiting until after the New Year (of course, just how long after the New Year depended on how willing we were to help take the decorations down and rearrange the furniture). Still, there are those liturgical purists who claim Christmas hangs around for its full twelve days and they don’t put it away until Epiphany (January 6). Either way, when Christmas is over, you haul it out by the road or put it back in its box. You take it off the door, out of the windows, down from the mantle, and you put it back in the basement, back in the attic, out in the garage. When Christmas is over, you put Mary, Joseph, the shepherds, Magi, and the little, baby Jesus back in their Styrofoam molds. But what do you do with Easter when it’s over?
Maybe you hang it back in the closet, next to the suit you wear for funerals. Maybe you shove it all in the cookie jar on the counter, hoping your kids will forget about it and all those chalky, chocolate footballs that came with it. Maybe you tuck it back in the file folder of your memory, right along with the smell of vinegar and food coloring, the taste of boiled eggs, and the grainy feeling of yellow-colored sugar on marshmallows. Maybe you put it back in its place, so you’ll know right where it is come next year, and you can pull it out, dust it off, and remind yourself and everyone who sees you that you still have it…what do you do with Easter when it’s over?
Every year, I tend to think about what it must have been like for those first followers of Jesus, those first folks who had to answer such a question. I mean, what do you do with Easter when it’s over—right after it happened?! Did they sleep at all that first Easter Sunday night? What about Monday? Could they have even contemplated going back to work? How would that conversation go? “Uh, boss, I’m sorry, but I can’t come in today. In fact, I may never come back. Something happened yesterday that has turned my whole life right-side-up.” Did they run down to all the synagogues, knock on the rabbis’ office doors, just to tell them they had all missed it? Did they march up to the palace of Pontius Pilate, swords in hand, and demand the liberation of their people because their messiah was indeed alive, back from the dead? Did they reignite a spark of self-righteous piety, standing on street corners, calling down everyone who passed by for not believing, for not acknowledging the anointed nature of Jesus’ life and ministry? Did they publish their experiences, hoping someone would come calling, wanting to buy the movie rights? After all, it isn’t every day that you run into someone who knows somebody who came back from the dead! What did they do with Easter once it was over?
Mark leaves us in the dark, sort of, only telling us that the women fled the tomb out of fear, but anyone who reads those words would know better. After all, how would the story get out if they “said nothing to anyone?” Matthew tells us that the disciples returned to Galilee, worshipped Jesus, and Jesus gave them what we call “the Great Commission.” John gives us a touch more with stories about Jesus appearing to Mary Magdalene, the other disciples, and an interesting scene in chapter 21 on the beach of the Sea of Tiberias, where Jesus cooks breakfast for his disciples and has a rather interesting conversation with Peter. But it’s Luke’s account that we are interested in this morning.
In Luke, the resurrected Jesus appears to the women at the tomb, two disciples on the road to Emmaus, and to the rest of his disciples before ascending into heaven. Luke doesn’t end his story there, however—he wrote a sequel. We call it The Acts of the Apostles (or just Acts). Now, in Acts, if you want to ask the question, “What do you do with Easter when it’s over?” you’re going to get some pretty amazing answers. For starters, there’s the whole incident at Pentecost: the disciples (with a newly minted member to replace Judas) are gathered together in one place when a loud, violent, wind comes rushing in, bringing with it “Divided tongues, as of fire.”[1] This arrival of the Holy Spirit enables all of those gathered together for the festival of Pentecost to hear the disciples’ words in their own, native languages. In fact, Peter is so empowered that he delivers a sermon right there on the spot that winds up with some 3,000-people baptized and added to the number of the followers.
The first movement of Acts mostly focuses on Peter’s empowered actions. Accompanied often by John, Peter heals a crippled beggar in chapter three, stands boldly before the council in chapter four, defending his actions in healing the beggar and proclaiming the gospel, and by chapter five, we hear all about the healings performed by the apostles. In fact, if one were to read the book of Acts, one might get the impression that the answer to the question, “What do you do with Easter once it’s over?” would be “preach, heal, and perform miracles.” There is, however, a subtler answer that lies in Luke’s words in Acts, an answer that may not pack the punch of a miracle story we’ve told and retold during vacation Bible school, but an answer that holds the power—great power! —to dramatically change the world.
There are hints of this power laced throughout the opening chapters of Luke’s second volume. One such hint comes at the end of chapter two: “Awe came upon everyone, because many wonders and signs were being done by the apostles…” What “wonders and signs”? Luke hasn’t told us about any of them yet, has he? Maybe the wonders and signs are what follows: “All who believed were together and had all things in common; they would sell their possessions and goods and distribute the proceeds to all, as any had need. Day by day, as they spent much time together in the temple, they broke bread at home and ate their food with glad and generous hearts, praising God and having the goodwill of all the people. And day by day the Lord added to their number those who were being saved.[2] Isn’t that something? Could it be that the great power—the wonders and signs that were being done by the apostles—was found in this communal way of life? Could it be that the power to change the world is found more in the sharing of what we have, the breaking and eating of bread together, the making sure everyone has what they need, than it is in miraculous healings and acts of wonder?
Luke throws a few more hints our way in chapter five, when Ananias and Sapphira are struck dead. Why do these two members of this first Christian community suddenly succumb to the shock of death? Was it because of some wrong teaching they believed? Was it because of their lack of faithful attendance, a failed Bible quiz, or a failure to appear for prayer meeting? No. They were struck dead because they “sold a piece of property, [and] kept back some of the proceeds and brought only a part and laid it at the apostles’ feet.”[3] In other words, this husband and wife had committed the grave error of holding something back for themselves, or hoarding and hiding something that would have been beneficial for the community as a whole. Could it be that the greater grievance to God is not found in the theological and interpretive arguments we love to have, but in the everyday ignorance of the needs of those around us and the ways in which we hold on to that which isn’t ours in the first place?
Then there’s the text before us this morning; the text that sets the stage for the whole scene involving Ananias and Sapphira. Now, we might be tempted to single out verse 33 as the proof text for this entire passage (“With great power the apostles gave their testimony to the resurrection of the Lord Jesus, and great grace was upon them all.”) That sentence does sound, after all, more like something we might want to read in the Bible: the apostles giving their testimonies with great power. But that’s not the whole story; in fact, that verse is smack-dab in the middle of our passage. Luke tells us: “Now the whole group of those who believed were of one heart and soul, and no one claimed private ownership of any possessions, but everything they owned was held in common. With great power the apostles gave their testimony to the resurrection of the Lord Jesus, and great grace was upon them all. There was not a needy person among them, for as many as owned lands or houses sold them and brought the proceeds of what was sold. They laid it at the apostles' feet, and it was distributed to each as any had need.”[4]
Could it be that the power of the apostles’ testimony was found in the very way they lived together? Could it be that the great power of Christ’s followers is found not in empirical might, not in cultural dominance, not in miracle management, but in the very act of placing the needs of others ahead of ourselves? You know, that might be the very thing that could change the world. That sort of power may be exactly what it takes to turn things right-side-up. After all, arguing won’t get us anywhere (Phillip Yancey, an Evangelical author, once said, “No one ever converted to Christianity because they lost the argument,”[5] and I believe he’s right!). No, arguing won’t get us anywhere. Neither will miracles. I know that may be a bit of a shock to some of you, but it’s true. The world is just too skeptical; folks are just too ready with an explanation, a way to disprove whatever miraculous event we may claim as proof of our message. There is, however, one thing that is downright impossible to disprove, one act of great power that cannot be denied or construed, one way of being in this world that can’t help but cause others to stop and take notice—why it may even make folks angry at you!
It’s that great power found in Christ to overcome self, to overcome self and be liberated to the resurrection reality that life isn’t about what you can get, but what you can give. Eugene Peterson says, "The kingdom of self is heavily defended territory,"[6] but the power of Easter’s revelation shows us that the kingdom of self is a false one, in need of deconstruction, so that we may take hold of God’s calling on our lives to selflessly serve others, to give more of ourselves away, to see the needs of those around us as far more important than whatever barriers we’ve placed between “us and them,” so that we may realize that there is no “them.” There is only “us.”
So, what do you do with Easter when it’s over? You take it out into the world and live it! You live into the reality that God has called us—shown us—that the way of God’s kingdom is one of self-emptying, self-sacrificing love, that the way of God’s kingdom is a way of seeing the needs of others and giving all we can in order to meet those needs, that the way of God’s kingdom, the way of great power, is found not in our strength, correctness, or influence, but in the deliberate, selfless drive to love God and everyone else, and to show that love by meeting the needs of those all around us, throughout the world, until no need is left, and the kingdom of God comes in all its fullness. Amen.




[1] Acts 2:3a
[2] Acts 2:43-47
[3] Acts 5:1a-2
[4] Acts 4:32-35
[5] Philip Yancey, Rumours of Another World: What on Earth Are We Missing? (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Zondervan, 2004).
[6] Eugene H. Peterson, The Contemplative Pastor: Returning to the Art of Spiritual Direction, Reprint edition (Grand Rapids, Mich: Eerdmans, 1993), 31.