Wednesday, April 12, 2017

"Life where there once was Death" (Fifth Sunday in Lent)

John 11:1-45
1 Now a certain man was ill, Lazarus of Bethany, the village of Mary and her sister Martha. 2 Mary was the one who anointed the Lord with perfume and wiped his feet with her hair; her brother Lazarus was ill. 3 So the sisters sent a message to Jesus, "Lord, he whom you love is ill." 4 But when Jesus heard it, he said, "This illness does not lead to death; rather it is for God's glory, so that the Son of God may be glorified through it." 5 Accordingly, though Jesus loved Martha and her sister and Lazarus, 6 after having heard that Lazarus was ill, he stayed two days longer in the place where he was. 7 Then after this he said to the disciples, "Let us go to Judea again." 8 The disciples said to him, "Rabbi, the Jews were just now trying to stone you, and are you going there again?" 9 Jesus answered, "Are there not twelve hours of daylight? Those who walk during the day do not stumble, because they see the light of this world. 10 But those who walk at night stumble, because the light is not in them." 11 After saying this, he told them, "Our friend Lazarus has fallen asleep, but I am going there to awaken him." 12 The disciples said to him, "Lord, if he has fallen asleep, he will be all right." 13 Jesus, however, had been speaking about his death, but they thought that he was referring merely to sleep. 14 Then Jesus told them plainly, "Lazarus is dead. 15 For your sake I am glad I was not there, so that you may believe. But let us go to him." 16 Thomas, who was called the Twin, said to his fellow disciples, "Let us also go, that we may die with him." 17 When Jesus arrived, he found that Lazarus had already been in the tomb four days. 18 Now Bethany was near Jerusalem, some two miles away, 19 and many of the Jews had come to Martha and Mary to console them about their brother. 20 When Martha heard that Jesus was coming, she went and met him, while Mary stayed at home. 21 Martha said to Jesus, "Lord, if you had been here, my brother would not have died. 22 But even now I know that God will give you whatever you ask of him." 23 Jesus said to her, "Your brother will rise again." 24 Martha said to him, "I know that he will rise again in the resurrection on the last day." 25 Jesus said to her, "I am the resurrection and the life. Those who believe in me, even though they die, will live, 26 and everyone who lives and believes in me will never die. Do you believe this?" 27 She said to him, "Yes, Lord, I believe that you are the Messiah, the Son of God, the one coming into the world." 28 When she had said this, she went back and called her sister Mary, and told her privately, "The Teacher is here and is calling for you." 29 And when she heard it, she got up quickly and went to him. 30 Now Jesus had not yet come to the village, but was still at the place where Martha had met him. 31 The Jews who were with her in the house, consoling her, saw Mary get up quickly and go out. They followed her because they thought that she was going to the tomb to weep there. 32 When Mary came where Jesus was and saw him, she knelt at his feet and said to him, "Lord, if you had been here, my brother would not have died." 33 When Jesus saw her weeping, and the Jews who came with her also weeping, he was greatly disturbed in spirit and deeply moved. 34 He said, "Where have you laid him?" They said to him, "Lord, come and see." 35 Jesus began to weep. 36 So the Jews said, "See how he loved him!" 37 But some of them said, "Could not he who opened the eyes of the blind man have kept this man from dying?" 38 Then Jesus, again greatly disturbed, came to the tomb. It was a cave, and a stone was lying against it. 39 Jesus said, "Take away the stone." Martha, the sister of the dead man, said to him, "Lord, already there is a stench because he has been dead four days." 40 Jesus said to her, "Did I not tell you that if you believed, you would see the glory of God?" 41 So they took away the stone. And Jesus looked upward and said, "Father, I thank you for having heard me. 42 I knew that you always hear me, but I have said this for the sake of the crowd standing here, so that they may believe that you sent me." 43 When he had said this, he cried with a loud voice, "Lazarus, come out!" 44 The dead man came out, his hands and feet bound with strips of cloth, and his face wrapped in a cloth. Jesus said to them, "Unbind him, and let him go." 45 Many of the Jews therefore, who had come with Mary and had seen what Jesus did, believed in him.

            This story is the hinge upon which the entire narrative of the fourth gospel swings. It is a story rich in Easter allusions, not-so-subtle winks at Jesus’ own death, burial, and resurrection. It is this very event which causes the high priest Caiaphas and the rest of the religious establishment to decide to put Jesus to death (it says so just beyond our text in verse 53: “So from that day on they planned to put him to death”). It is a story that shows us the power of Christ, the power to resuscitate a man who had been four-days-dead and sealed in a rock-hewn tomb. I suppose some would argue it’s the most powerful of all of Jesus’ signs; it tops healing the sick, restoring site to the blind, causing the lame to leap, and even feeding more than five thousand people with a handful of fish and bread.
It’s a story that captures our imaginations as we visualize Jesus standing before the cavernous tomb, the smell of death hissing from the behind the stone as its rolled away, breaking the seal between the deceased and the living. We see him standing there like the great concrete statues strewn about cemeteries: strong, determined, yet with a calmness that can hold back the cosmic power of the Creator of the universe. He calls out Lazarus by name and we can swear the very onion-skin pages of our Bibles flutter at the power in his voice. Then, almost comically, wrapped in strips of cloth, with a handkerchief over his face, out hops Lazarus—the one who had been dead, but is now alive. Why, we may even pause to marvel for a moment at the evangelistic outcome of verse 45: “Many of the Jews, therefore, who had come with Mary and had seen what Jesus did, believed in him.” We may pause there to ponder over the persuasive power of Jesus’ reviving of Lazarus. This is no doubt one of the most memorable and captivating stories in all of Scripture, but I have to tell you, it captures my attention in a different way this morning.
You see, while it is easy to get swept up in the resolution of this story, to focus one’s attention on the powerful outcome of Christ’s presence at the tomb of his beloved friend Lazarus, I’m more than just a bit…distracted by the beginning of the story. It’s almost like an itch you try to ignore, hoping it’ll just go away, but eventually you just have to scratch it. You see, I can’t help but wonder: why did Jesus “stay two days longer in the place where he was” after getting word from Mary and Martha that “the one whom he loved was ill”? Seriously. Now, I know—I know—some folks will say, “Well, Chris, Jesus knew Lazarus would die, and he knew he was going to raise him from the dead, so Jesus just hung out a little while as a part of God’s plan and then went on to Bethany.” I suppose there’s room for that argument, but if I’m honest, it’s sounds a little too much like those easy one-liners some preachers give at funerals, those sort of theologically-veneered words that only attempt to speak to the spiritual complexity of the moment: “God needed another angel in his heavenly choir, so he called your boy home…God’s ways are higher than ours…(and I swear a friend of mine told me he heard a preacher say this at the funeral of a little child) God needed another flower in his garden, so he picked yours.” I suppose there’s room in the text to say that Jesus tarried two days more because it was part of his plan (perhaps verse four suggests such a position), but if I’m honest with you, that just doesn’t sit well with me and what I believe about Jesus.
It just doesn’t seem right that Jesus would let his beloved friend die, that he would allow Mary and Martha to go through the pain of losing their brother, that he would stay in the place where he was long enough for the family to gather, for the mourners to come around, for the tomb to be opened, for the body to be prepared, for the funeral to be held, for the casseroles to be dropped off, the jugs of sweet tea and baskets of fried chicken to be left on Martha and Mary’s counters, for the stone to be rolled back over the entrance of the tomb, and the body of Lazarus left to decay. It just doesn’t seem right.
I’d like to think that if it had been me it would have gone differently, because, friends, I’m telling you right now, if Denise and Charis (my best friend John’s two sisters) sent word to me that my best friend was ill, lying in the ICU, and didn’t have long to make it, I believe I’d be in the truck heading south! Sure, there’s the Lord’s work to do, but isn’t that part of it too? I’d bet most of you in this room would do the same of you got such a call. I tell you, it just doesn’t seem right to me—especially given all the trouble the fourth gospel goes through to tell us how much Jesus loves Lazarus. It just seems like he would have headed on down to Bethany as soon as he got word: “Lord, the one whom you love is ill,” to which Jesus would’ve answered, “Alright boys, pack it up; we’re heading back to Bethany; Lazarus isn’t doing well and I’m going to go heal him.” After all, wouldn’t healing his sick friend have been a powerful sign too, one he had done before, one he knew he was capable of doing? Wouldn’t healing Lazarus avoided the broken hearts of two sisters, family and friends? I’m telling you, it catches me every time I read this story, but I think another verse in this text may shed some light on this quandary.
In many English translations it’s the shortest verse in the whole Bible, John 11:35, “Jesus wept.The New Revised Standard Version captures the proper conjugation a bit better: “Jesus began to weep.” It’s interesting to me what causes Jesus to begin weeping. In verse 32 it says, “When Mary came where Jesus was and saw him, she knelt at his feet and said to him, 'Lord, if you had been here, my brother would not have died." It’s important to notice these are the same words Martha uses in verse 21, after which, Jesus gives Martha a compact lesson on eternal life and resurrection, offering her one of the “I am” statements laced throughout the fourth gospel. The story goes on to say in verses 33-34: “When Jesus saw her weeping, and the Jews who came with her also weeping, he was greatly disturbed in spirit and deeply moved. He said, ‘Where have you laid him?’ They said to him, ‘Lord, come and see.’"
It’s that phrase—uttered just before we’re told Jesus began to weep—“come and see,” that is filled with more meaning that we may first realize. In three other places in the fourth gospel that exact phrase is used: Jesus speaks these words when we calls Andrew and Peter in 1:39; Philip speaks them when he calls Nathaniel to join him in following Jesus in 1:46; and the Samaritan woman at the well speaks these exact words in 4:29 when speaking to the people in her village about Jesus. In every case (including the one before us when the weeping mourners respond to Jesus), these are words of invitation, words that invite one to draw closer into the life of God’s kingdom, to witness the inbreaking reality of God. It’s at the speaking of these words that Jesus begins to weep, and I think it may be because they are words that have triggered something deep within our Lord, the emotional straw that broke the camel’s back. These were the words used to call people into the kingdom, perhaps words Jesus had used to call Lazarus, and now they were being spoken to him. And maybe, just maybe, those words—those three words—released in Jesus what he had been holding on to since he got word from Martha and Mary at least four days before.
I don’t really have to imagine what that’s like. I don’t have to imagine, because I’ve been there. I remember when I got the message. It was almost eight years ago. I was sitting in my office, getting somewhat settled for the day, when my cell phone rang. It was my dad—Dad doesn’t call me, or anyone, really, for that matter. When I answered the phone, I heard my dad say on the other end, “Son, your grandma ain’t doing too good. It won’t be long now. Just wanted to let you know and ask if you’d do the funeral.” I hadn’t really done a funeral at that point in my time as a pastor—I had been to a few, but hadn’t actually put one together, but I told my dad I would because I couldn’t imagine who else would and I didn’t want some preacher who didn’t know my grandma trying to preach her into hell and everybody else into heaven. Dad told me they weren’t sure how long Grandma would hold out, but it could be a week or two. It wasn’t—it was a day or two.
The next phone call came, and I packed a suit, a white shirt, black shoes, and a tie along with my black leather bible, and Sallie and I drove down to Enterprise. Looking back, I wasn’t really upset; I was fine. I mean, I went to my home church and talked to people like nothing bad had happened. Showed up at the visitation, and there was my dad, my two aunts, and my uncle standing by this rather showy casket that I was sure one of my aunts or uncles picked out, because there was no one Grandma or Dad did. I was fine. I shook hands with people who knew me even though I didn’t know them, saw people I hadn’t seen in years—maybe decades, was hugged by total strangers and people I had known my whole life. Still, I was fine. I saw Grandma in that box wearing a dress (I didn’t know she still owned one; most of my life she wore jeans, t-shirts and flannel shirts, and if she wore shoes they were black rubber boots or old, worn-out white tennis shoes); her hair was fixed, and she was wearing makeup—I was quite sure she didn’t know what makeup was. I remember too, her glasses were clean: Grandma’s glasses were never clean. I saw her in that box, but still, I was fine.
The next day came, and I put on my suit, my white shirt, tie, black shoes, and I carried my bible and the five by seven note cards I had scratched the service down on. I was fine. I arrived at the funeral home the hour before with the rest of the family; there was time for more awkward handshakes and hugs, more introductions of people who knew me without me knowing them, more time to look at Grandma in that box, but still, I was fine. Eventually, the funeral director asked all the friends to have a seat in the chapel; he pulled the stiff, accordion divider closed, and shut the doors leading into the parlor. He told us we’d have a few more minutes with Grandma before the service. A few of my folks stepped out the side door to burn one more cigarette before the service (I suspect they thought I might be long-winded), while the rest just sort of mumbled to each other or counted the threads in the carpet. I was fine though.
After a few minutes passed, the funeral director walked back in and gave a few instructions about the service, and then he said, “Before we go out, I’m going to ask the minister to offer a word of prayer.” I was the only one looking around; I forgot I was the minister! I was fine.  A prayer is easy. I did the same thing I have done countless times before and since: I took a half step forward, looked around the room and said, “Let us pray.” In that moment, I saw people I know hadn’t darkened the door of a church in decades, folks who drank, cussed, smoked, ran around, lied, cheated, and stole, folks who were decent enough, but likely wouldn’t make anyone’s list of “outstanding citizens” bow their heads and close their eyes like it was something they did every day after lunch. I said, “Let us pray,” and the next word out of my mouth was “God…”
That was it. Turns out, I wasn’t fine after all. My throat closed up, my jaw felt like it was going to shake loose from my head, my eyes were burning and heavy. I tried to say more, but I couldn’t. All I could say was “God…” I had put off the inevitable for as long as I could. I had resisted the urge to mourn believing there was something more important, some task that needed tending to first, but I couldn’t hold it back any longer. That word broke the emotional levy, and in that room, in that moment, there were no easy one-liners that could console me, no bumper-sticker religion that was going to make me feel better. No, in that moment I needed the kind of faith that made it ok to weep, the kind of faith that made it alright to mourn, the kind of faith that recognizes the reality of pain and grief that comes with life and death. I need that kind of faith, and I believe we all need that kind of faith.

Because when the time comes, the quaint sayings we offer to others won’t be enough to sustain us. We need a faith that tells us it’s ok to be overwhelmed, that the weight of the world is impossible to carry alone, that when our hearts break and our minds are troubled, we have a God in Christ who has been there too and will go there with us time and time again, because he’s never going to leave, never going to give up on us, and never means even beyond death itself! That’s the kind of faith we need, and thanks be to God that is the kind of faith we have! That’s the kind of savior we have in Christ Jesus, whose heart breaks when our hearts are broken, whose mind is troubled when our minds cannot be still, whose eyes weep when we can’t hold back the tears anymore. That’s the kind of savior we have, the kind of God we have in Jesus, one who doesn’t dismiss our distress as a lack of faith, but is always there, calling us back, reminding us in winks and whispers that death does not have the last word, that a grave is only a temporary plot, that there will always be life where there once was death. Amen. 

"Blessing not Curses" (Second Sunday in Lent)

Genesis 12:1-4a
1 Now the Lord said to Abram, "Go from your country and your kindred and your father's house to the land that I will show you. 2 I will make of you a great nation, and I will bless you, and make your name great, so that you will be a blessing. 3 I will bless those who bless you, and the one who curses you I will curse; and in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed." 4 So Abram went, as the Lord had told him; and Lot went with him.

            To read the story of God and God’s people in Scripture is to read a story with a rocky beginning. Oh sure, it sounds lovely and mesmerizingly mysterious in those first two chapters, with God speaking the universe into existence or getting God’s anthropomorphic hands dirty in the act of shaping human beings from dust and rib bones. A lot of ink rests on a lot of pages in a lot of books about those two chapters to be sure, but it doesn’t take long—not long at all—before the story starts to go off the rails.
            In the first verses of chapter three the story takes a dark, more dramatic turn. The woman the Lord has created has a theological debate with a snake that winds up with her and her man eating fruit which had been forbidden by the Lord. Their eyes are opened; they see their nakedness; they cover themselves up and hide—they hide from God. It’s the very moment in the story of God and God’s people where the needle scratches on the record, where the tires screech, where sin slips so seductively out of the shadow of human will and into the light of day. What’s the result of this crack in creation? What is the sum of sin’s arrival into Eden’s perfection? Expulsion…punishment…curses. The man and woman (along with the snake) are cursed by God in chapter 3, verses 14-19:
The Lord God said to the serpent, "Because you have done this, cursed are you among all animals and among all wild creatures; upon your belly you shall go, and dust you shall eat all the days of your life. I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers; he will strike your head, and you will strike his heel." To the woman he said, "I will greatly increase your pangs in childbearing; in pain you shall bring forth children, yet your desire shall be for your husband, and he shall rule over you." And to the man he said, "Because you have listened to the voice of your wife, and have eaten of the tree about which I commanded you, "You shall not eat of it,' cursed is the ground because of you; in toil you shall eat of it all the days of your life; thorns and thistles it shall bring forth for you; and you shall eat the plants of the field. By the sweat of your face you shall eat bread until you return to the ground, for out of it you were taken; you are dust, and to dust you shall return."

            With the arrival of sin in God’s garden came death and punishment and curses. One might think that such a dramatic turn of events over the consumption of fruit would have some lasting effect on the man and the woman, such an effect that might cause them to remember the Lord’s anger and teach their offspring the right way. We don’t even have to turn the page, however, to see that such a lesson is not so easily transmitted to the next generation, for in Chapter four of Genesis murder makes its way through the cracked door left ajar by that first sin. Cain, in his jealousy, kills his brother Able. And what is God’s response? Curses: “And now you are cursed from the ground, which has opened its mouth to receive your brother's blood from your hand. When you till the ground, it will no longer yield to you its strength; you will be a fugitive and a wanderer on the earth."[1]
            I’m afraid it doesn’t look much better from here, for after a chapter of genealogy in chapter five, we’re told in chapter six that “The Lord saw that the wickedness of humankind was great in the earth, and that every inclination of the thoughts of their hearts was only evil continually. And the Lord was sorry that he had made humankind on the earth, and it grieved him to his heart.”[2] We’re not even into double-digit page numbers and already God is sorry to have ever even fooled with the idea of creation. God’s had it to the back teeth with the sin and wickedness in the world, the way things seem to have spun out of control and away from what was perhaps a higher plan. So God set out with a plan, a “reset” on the world; God was going to punish sin and ultimately curse those responsible for it in one, grand, final way—God was going to drown them all! Well, all of them except Noah and his family.
            Yet even after building an arc and surviving a devastating flood, after witnessing firsthand the enormity of God’s power and desire to rid the world of wickedness, after covenanting with God God’s self, Noah puts things back in the gutter before the puddles are even dry! Noah plants a vineyard, gets drunk on his own wine, and after passing out naked, something happens that causes Noah to curse his own grandson.[3] It seems humankind can’t shake this whole cursing and punishment thing because even in chapter eleven, all the peoples of the world (having obviously not learned anything from Adam and Eve, or Cain, or the flood) decide to come together to build a tower in another attempt to reach some god-like status. When the Lord catches wind of their scheme, however, God scatters them across the land and confuses their language—a punishment meant to keep the people from ever attempting such a feat again. [I’m not sure what page your Bible is on by now, but I’m barely on page ten!]
            This whole punishment/curse way of existence seems to have imprinted itself in the foundational sequences of our human DNA. At the first inclination of wrongdoing, many of us are quick to call for punishment, for the proper sentence to be handed down. We seem to be hard-wired with this retaliatory response, with lightning-quick defense mechanisms that allow us to return blow for blow and curse for curse. Why we even seem to celebrate this way of existence by rejoicing in the news of the failure of our foes and what we believe to be their “just deserts.” Punishment and curses seem natural to us: after all, what would the world be without such things to set the sinners straight? Do such things really set sinners straight?
I wonder if perhaps such a thought had occurred to God. You see, for the first eleven chapters of Genesis, God is pretty handy with the “punishment/curse” way of governing creation. However, no matter how many times God curses or punishes, humankind still slinks back into sin; we still find a way to conveniently forget the lessons of our own history. I mean, even a flood that kills EVERYTHING doesn’t do it! I wonder if perhaps God decided to shift the approach of control over creation, or if maybe God had another way in mind all along…
By the time we arrive at the part of God’s story in the text before us this morning, we’ve been through the cycle of curses and punishment enough times to see the pattern. You get the sense that God may be a bit tired of fooling with us fractured folks, that maybe God is ready to throw in the towel and let us run creation into the ground, take care of the destruction ourselves. We might be tempted to come to such a conclusion, but that is before we really read these three and a half verses before us (listen to it again):  “Now the Lord said to Abram, ‘Go from your country and your kindred and your father's house to the land that I will show you. I will make of you a great nation, and I will bless you, and make your name great, so that you will be a blessing. I will bless those who bless you, and the one who curses you I will curse; and in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed." So Abram went, as the Lord had told him.”
            Notice anything different? This isn’t the Eden imperative, a restriction followed by a threat. This isn’t the Lord who curses the ground should Abram fail to comply. No, this doesn’t even seem to be the same God who was sorry to have made humankind in the first place. In fact, there’s no mention of what would happen if Abram didn’t go “as the Lord had told him.” No punishment. No curse. What is there then? BLESSING! Blessing: for the first time in the story of God and God’s people we hear that word. After generations of punishment and curses—blessing. It’s almost as if God was through trying it the old-fashioned way and took creation in a new direction, one where curses only come to those who curse the ones who have been charged with doing the blessing, one where people are not threatened with punishment and curses from the angry Almighty, but where they are promised blessings from the God who calls on human agents to carry out such blessings.
            Sure, it may be a bit messier this way. After all, we’re still cracked creatures, broken vessels who seem to spend more time searching for our own blessings than we do bearing blessing for others, but still, it seems to be the way God has ordered things, especially in the light of the text before us. It’s blessings, not curses. It’s a promise for the future, a promise that is only truly fulfilled in the unseen future, which means it is a promise bigger than Abram himself, a God-sized promise. It’s the kind of promise, the kind of blessings, that can only truly come from God, even if they may come by way of human agents. In these three and a half verses, God has shifted the entire course of creation, changed the trajectory of the story by abandoning a method of threatening commands laced with curses for the way of blessing. God has focused on a way of blessing that is about action, trust, faith, and the promise of things yet to be seen.
            Isn’t that really what this season is about too? Aren’t we reminded, as we draw closer to the cross, closer to Holy Week, closer to Easter’s empty tomb, that God has made a way through blessing, a way towards life, a way of hope in the promise of those things yet to be seen? Is not one of the predominant lessons of this season that the cruel curses of punishment and death, manifested in Christ’s execution on the cross, are overcome by the power of Christ’s resurrection? It seems to me that this may have been God’s way from the begging—at least the beginning with Abram. It seems to me that we human beings seek to right the wrongs of this world, the wrongs committed against us and our kin, by enforcing punishments we feel fit the crimes or by cursing those who dare step a toe out of line with our definition of what is right. Of course, the truth is as long as we have done this it has never really solved anything. Punishment and curses have not rid the world of wickedness—it didn’t with God’s flood, why should it with our feeble attempts? Punishment and curses have not healed broken relationships or fully restored or rehabilitated those who have gone astray—it certainly didn’t seem to work with Cain’s descendants. As one scholar puts it in addressing this text: “In short, curse and punishment have solved nothing.”[4]
So it’s no surprise to me that God changes tracks in the story with Abram, a track that leads all the way through Canaan, through Egypt, on into the wilderness, through wars, wicked and selfish kings, through division, through exile and dispersion, through occupation and oppression, through a virgin womb and a feedbox baby bed, through the calling of fumbling disciples and the misunderstanding of miracles, through the provoking power of parables and scandalous encounters with those who are unclean, through betrayal, arrest, abandonment, accusation, assault, and even death. No, it’s no surprise to me that God changes tracks with Abram, that God moves from a God of curse and punishment to a God of promise and blessings. It’s no surprise to me, for that is the God I see—the God I know—in Christ Jesus! That is the God I see when I am tempted to believe in a dark world filled with anger, hatred, and ignorance, yet I hear joy in the laughter of a child and witness love in the interaction between strangers. That is the God I see when I am tempted to think the worst of everything, yet God reminds me that I am a part of bringing about the best of everything. That is the God I see when I look upon a cross meant to curse and see a promise and a blessing that fills the world with hope! Amen.




[1] Genesis 4:11-12.
[2] Genesis 6:5-6.
[3] Genesis 9:21-27. The passage simply says “Ham…saw the nakedness of his father,” which could be a reference to something sexual and incestuous, or it may refer more to the shame of Noah in his nakedness being broadcast as Ham “tells his brothers.” (NIB, Vol. 1, p.404.).
[4] Niedner, Frederick. "Second Sunday in Lent: Genesis 12:1-4a (Theological Perspective)." In Feasting on the Word: Year A, Volume 2 (Lent through Eastertide), edited by David L. Bartlett, & Barbara Brown Taylor. Louisville: Westminster/John Knox Press, 2010 (p52).