Monday, June 27, 2011

Suffered under Pontius Pilate; was crucified, dead, and buried. He descended into hell...

1 Peter 3:18-22
18 For Christ also suffered for sins once for all, the righteous for the unrighteous, in order to bring you to God. He was put to death in the flesh, but made alive in the spirit, 19 in which also he went and made a proclamation to the spirits in prison, 20 who in former times did not obey, when God waited patiently in the days of Noah, during the building of the ark, in which a few, that is, eight persons, were saved through water. 21 And baptism, which this prefigured, now saves you—not as a removal of dirt from the body, but as an appeal to God for  a good conscience, through the resurrection of Jesus Christ, 22 who has gone into heaven and is at the right hand of God, with angels, authorities, and powers made subject to him.

The great Southern author William Faulkner once said, “The salvation of the world is in man’s suffering,” and Faulkner himself knew a thing or two about suffering. He and his wife Estelle had lost their first child, a daughter named Alabama, just nine days after she was born, an event that would leave an indelible mark on Faulkner’s life as well as his fiction. Some three years later Faulkner’s childhood friend “Sonny” Bell and his wife Frances also lost their first child, a daughter. So Faulkner sat down in and wrote these words of condolence to his dear friend on a Friday in September of 1934 from his home in Oxford, Mississippi: “Human beings are so constituted (and thank God for it) that even grief cannot stay green very long. You will hate to hear this and hate more to believe it, and your very refusal to believe it will give you this comfort: it will help to tide you over into the time when grief will be quiet, and instead of a date on a calendar and a mark on the earth, the child will not be dead at all. It will be a living part of living experience which will last as long as mind and body last, and because of it after a while you can say to yourself, 'Because I have suffered, I know that I have been alive. It is suffering which has raised me above the articulated lumps of colored mud which teem the earth. And so long as I have grief, death cannot hurt me'."[1]
“So long as I have grief, death cannot hurt me.” What an odd thing to say. Grief, the result of the very suffering we experience from the lowest and darkest valleys along life’s journey, saves us from the real pain of death. Does this mean that we ought to welcome suffering with open arms? Should we look forward to the day when tragedy and grief will strike and our worlds will be turned upside down? Should we pursue calamity with a reckless fervor, hoping to stave off our final days? “The salvation of the world is in man’s suffering”—perhaps Faulkner’s words strike closer to the truth than he realized.
            Just as suffering was a common theme for Faulkner it is a common theme throughout the letter of 1 Peter. The author of this epistle is writing to a church that is dealing with all manner of trials and suffering because of their faith; they were being scorned and maligned; their very way of life was in danger as their families, social status, and their occupations were threatened. With such suffering, it would have been all too easy for one to lose faith and give up hope in Christ.[2] No wonder then that this epistle ends with these words in chapter 5, verse 12: I have written this short letter to encourage you and to testify that this is the true grace of God. Stand fast in it. Suffering for the cause of Christ was an ever-present reality for those early believers, and they stood in need of encouragement in the face of such real suffering.
            Of course, you and I are no strangers to suffering ourselves. While none of you may have a clue as to what it means to suffer for our faith, each one of you in your own life has experienced some calamity, some tragedy that has caused your world to stand on its head and spin backwards. Each of us has felt either the disorientation of losing a job, the pain of losing a loved one, the life-altering shock of hearing a dreaded diagnosis—we have all to one degree or another, as human beings in a shared existence, come to understand what it means to suffer, to suffer with the very ways of this world and the darkness that is in it. Thanks be to God you and I are not alone in our suffering.
            You see, whenever you may feel as if you are abandoned in your suffering, as if no one else could possibly feel what you have felt…hear these first words of the text before us today in verse 18: For Christ also suffered. It’s such a simple phrase, just four little words, yet it is overflowing with power. Christ, the eternal, only begotten Son of God, suffered. For that very reason the Church, down through the centuries, has recited those words in the Apostles’ Creed that Christ “suffered under Pontius Pilate.” Jesus is not simply an aloof savior who magically waves his cross-shaped wand and makes atonement for sin. No, Christ is a savior who has lived in our skin, walked on the hard, cracked ground, breathed the dusty air, and above all, has suffered in his flesh. Christ also suffered.
            But why? Really, why would the Son of the Almighty, all-knowing, ever-present God go through the trouble, the pain, and the heartbreak of suffering? Not one of you here today would rush to the front of the line to voluntarily suffer if it were within your power to avoid it. And who would blame you? If we finish reading the words in verse 18, however, we find the reason the eternal Son of God chose such suffering: For Christ also suffered for sins once for all, the righteous for the unrighteous, in order to bring you to God. Christ’s suffering has purpose! He suffered for sins once for all. Christ’s suffering was for your sins, my sins, once for all. Never would another have to suffer on behalf of the sins of another; never would sacrifice and offering have to be made on behalf of our sins. Hallelujah! Crank up the organ; pass the plate and shout the benediction, we can all go home knowing that Christ’s suffering was for our sins once for all.
            But now hang on just a minute. If that’s all there is to understanding Christ’s suffering then the gates of heaven could not hold the number of those who would long to get in. Church’s would find the proclamation of the gospel much easier. If that’s all there is to understanding the suffering of Christ, then seminaries and universities would be filled with scholars trying to understand the theology of gnats and houseflies. So what is it about the suffering of the Son of God that is so difficult to stomach for so many people? What is it that complicates comprehension of Calvary’s climactic crucifixion? Is it the difficulty in believing that the Almighty God would be made flesh? That God could actually feel pain and simply allow his son to suffer a slow and agonizing death on a splintered cross? While these things may be difficult for the logical, reason-driven, post-enlightenment mind to grasp, I have a feeling there is another reason that so many simply refuse to acknowledge the truth of Christ’s suffering, a reason that maybe even many of you find hard to swallow, and I believe that reason is found in these ever-deepening words of our Scripture today.
            Not only does the author say in verse 18 that Christ…suffered for sins once for all, he goes on to say Christ (the righteous) suffered for the unrighteous, in order to bring you to God. He was put to death in the flesh, but made alive in the spirit, and then in verses 19 and 20 the author goes on to write that Christ (in the spirit) went and made a proclamation to the spirits in prison, who in former times did not obey, when God waited patiently in the days of Noah, during the building of the ark, in which a few, that is, eight persons, were saved through water.  It is in these puzzling words that the Apostles’ Creed claims that Jesus “descended into hell,” though the text says nothing of descending nor does it directly make any mention of hell. In fact, the writer of 1 Peter doesn’t necessarily have hell in mind here at all. If we are to understand what the author is getting at, we have to look outside of our canon of Scripture to an apocryphal book that was very popular in the days of Jesus and the early Church—the book of 1 Enoch.
            In 1 Enoch we find story of Enoch (the man in Genesis 5:24 who walked with God; then he was no more, because God took him) as he is shown the history of heaven, leading up to the time of the flood in Genesis 6. During his heavenly tour, we are introduced to a group called “the watchers,” who were the fallen angels who had been with human women, and their offspring were giants “from whose bodies ‘evil spirits’ [had] come.”[3] These giants, referred to in Genesis 6 as Nephilim, came to represent the most vial generation to have ever lived. Such a tradition was no doubt well-known and popular during the time of Jesus, his disciples, and the writing of 1 Peter. So, when the author of our text today says that Jesus made a proclamation to the spirits in prison, who in former times did not obey, when God waited patiently in the days of Noah, during the building of the ark, it is very likely he’s referring to these “spirits,” traditionally understood as the most dreadful of sinners.
            You see, what the author of 1 Peter is trying to communicate to us isn’t necessarily the answers to where Jesus went and what Jesus did between Good Friday and Easter Sunday. No, the writer of 1 Peter is communicating a much deeper truth. When he writes that Jesus made a proclamation to the spirits in prison, what he is saying is that even that generation that was considered irredeemable gets to hear the same gospel that even the most holy generation has the privilege of hearing. Think about it…even the most sinful, evil, disgusting generation of sinners have the grace-filled opportunity to hear the proclamation of the good news. The ones who many would have deemed undeserving, Jesus made a proclamation to them.
            That’s where I think people trip over the truth of Christ’s suffering. After all, it’s just fine for Christ to have suffered and died for me—it’s not like I’ve lived an altogether terrible life. It’s wonderful that Christ has suffered for the sins of those whose sins weren’t all that bad to begin with (it’s not like you’ve ever murdered anybody anyhow). But when grace begins to find its way into the hearts and lives of those you deem unworthy…well, that’s when we find the cost of discipleship too steep and the life of faith too burdensome. To think that Christ would die for me or for you is a blissful, glorious thought, but to think that the love of God extends to the one we find unfit to live…? That’s another thing altogether isn’t it? Kind of makes the Church feel less like a social club and more like a social service doesn’t it? Maybe that’s the point.
            He was found dead in a prison bathroom. He had been beaten to death by a fellow inmate. No one was really all that upset about it to tell the truth. He had only served two of his 957 years in prison, but no one was really all that up set to hear he hadn’t made it longer. See, no one really cared whether Jeffrey Dahmer lived or died after raping, dismembering, and murdering some 17 men and boys between 1978 and 1991. No one really cared, except for a man named Curt Booth. Booth was a member of the Crescent Church of Christ in Crescent, Oklahoma; he saw Dahmer on television and mailed him a Bible correspondence course teaching the way to salvation. Dahmer mailed a letter back to Booth expressing that he had accepted Christ, but there was no baptistery in the prison and no one who would baptize him. However, as it came to pass, a Church of Christ minister named Roy Ratcliff began weekly Bible lessons with Dahmer and eventually baptized him on May 10, 1994.[4]
            As you can imagine, many are quick to pronounce Dahmer’s story as just another case of “jailhouse religion.” But what if it’s not? What if one of the most notorious serial killers in modern history is listed among the saints in the kingdom of heaven? What does that then say about the depth of God’s grace? What does that say about the love in Christ’s suffering?
            I heard an old preacher say once, “When you get to heaven, you’ll look around and be surprised by all the people who you thought would be there, but aren’t. You’ll look around and be surprised by all the people who you never thought would be there, but are. You’ll look around and see all the lovely faces of all the wonderful people. Then, you’ll look around and be surprised most of all by the fact that you’re there.” Isn’t that the truth?
Let us pray…


[1] Doreen Fowler; Campbell McCool. “On Suffering: A Letter from William Faulkner,” American Literature, Vol. 57, No. 4. (Dec., 1985), pp. 650-652.
[2] Jobes, Karen H. Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament: 1 Peter. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2005. p.42.

[3] Jobes, Karen H. Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament: 1 Peter. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2005. p.244.

Monday, June 20, 2011

Who was conceived by the Holy Spirit, born of the Virgin Mary...

Luke 1:26-38
26 In the sixth month the angel Gabriel was sent by God to a town in Galilee called Nazareth, 27 to a virgin engaged to a man whose name was Joseph, of the house of David. The virgin's name was Mary. 28 And he came to her and said, "Greetings, favored one! The Lord is with you." 29 But she was much perplexed by his words and pondered what sort of greeting this might be. 30 The angel said to her, "Do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favor with God. 31 And now, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you will name him Jesus. 32 He will be great, and will be called the Son of the Most High, and the Lord God will give to him the throne of his ancestor David. 33 He will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and of his kingdom there will be no end." 34 Mary said to the angel, "How can this be, since I am a virgin?" 35 The angel said to her, "The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; therefore the child to be born will be holy; he will be called Son of God. 36 And now, your relative Elizabeth in her old age has also conceived a son; and this is the sixth month for her who was said to be barren. 37 For nothing will be impossible with God." 38 Then Mary said, "Here am I, the servant of the Lord; let it be with me according to your word." Then the angel departed from her.

Once upon a time, there was a professor of religion at Samford University who had a less than savory reputation. You see, there was a rumor that once, in his Biblical Perspectives class (a class every student at Samford must take), he had removed a student’s Bible from his desk, thrown it into a trash can, and even went so far as to strike a match and light it on fire! Now, depending on who you hear the story from, he may or may not have danced around the flaming trash can like a savage in the celebration of a successful hunt. I happened to have had this professor for a class at Samford; his name is Paul Holloway, and no, he didn’t throw a student’s Bible in the trash and set it on fire—he simply told the student if he was going to bring The Living Bible (a paraphrase, and not a real translation) to class, he might as well throw it in the trash and get a “real” Bible. Dr. Holloway now teaches at the School of Theology at Sewanee, The University of the South and is in fact one of the more Christ-like people I have had the pleasure to meet.
I recall one particular day in his class on Jesus and the gospels. We had been discussing a particular chapter from one of our texts, when it came time for class to be over we all started shuffling our books and putting them away in our bags or tucking them under our arms. I remember pushing my chair away from the table and rising out of my seat when Dr. Holloway said, “For next time I want you all to think about this: what if Mary wasn’t a virgin? What if we had unquestionable, DNA evidence that Joseph or some Roman soldier was in fact the earthly father of Jesus? Could he still be the Jesus we worship as the Son of God? Could everything else we believe about Jesus still be true? Have a nice day!” With that, Dr. Holloway casually walked out of the room, taking all the breathable air with him! We fell back in our seats and just stared at one another. (For the record, Dr. Holloway’s question was intended simply to provoke discussion, but you can see why he would have had such a reputation at Samford.)
Why is the virgin birth of Jesus important? Why have Christians for centuries recited a creed with the line “we believe… [in Jesus Christ] who was conceived by the Holy Spirit, born of the Virgin Mary”? What implications can such a doctrine really have on our daily lives? Does it matter at all, or is it simply the ancient residue of a heroic archetype? Perhaps it is best to begin by asking why we affirm such a doctrine in the first place.
I was driving through town one day, and I came to a red light and stopped behind one of “those” cars. You know the kind of car I’m talking about—one that looks like the back fenders are actually taped on with bumpers stickers. There were stickers expressing the driver’s pride in his or her honor student, stickers promoting a politician who hasn’t ran for office since the 1990s, even some that were faded, unrecognizable, colorless blotches, but the one that caught my attention most was a simple white sticker with a straight-to-the-point message written in maroon letters: “The Bible says it. I believe it. That settles it.” It was neither the first nor the last time I have read or heard that exact sentiment. Of course, I trust you see the flaw in such logic: many eyes read the Bible, and many minds read those same words differently. So while many people may say “Amen!” to just such a slogan, many of them will disagree as to what exactly the “Bible says.”
However, for many believers, it is simply enough to say that we believe in the virgin birth of Jesus because the Bible says that Mary was indeed a virgin when Jesus was conceived. We’re reminded of this at least once a year around December as the nativity stories of Luke and Matthew are read and recited in all manner of ways, from television specials to Christmas Eve sermons. It is of some importance, however, to point out that only Matthew and Luke seem to find the virgin birth of Jesus necessary to include in their telling of the good news, and both tell it in slightly different ways. But in the end, “the Bible says it,” so we cannot ignore the importance of the miraculous nature of Jesus’ conception and birth. But is it just enough to say we believe it because the Bible says it? After all, the Bible says we shouldn’t eat pork or catfish, and we should treat even the foreigner as we would like to be treated, but not all believers rush to shout “The Bible says it. I believe it. That settles it.” when it comes to those particular points. So there must be a deeper, perhaps more traditional or theological reason why we uphold this particular point of Christian orthodoxy.
The traditions and teachings of the Church throughout history have gone a long way in shaping the confessions and beliefs of the contemporary church. However, there have been times in the history of the Church when great men and women have challenged such traditions, calling us to reexamine why we believe what we say we believe in the first place. No one serves as a clearer example of such questioning than Martin Luther. Luther challenged many of the traditions of the Roman Catholic Church in the sixteenth century, especially in light of his understanding of Scripture. However, when it came to one particular doctrine, infant baptism, Luther believed it was a doctrine worth preserving, despite his confession that there was a lack of biblical evidence for such a practice. In his Large Catechism Luther wrote, “But if God did not accept the baptism of infants, He would not give the Holy Ghost nor any of His gifts to any of them; in short, during this long time unto this day no man upon earth could have been a Christian.” In other words, surely God would not have allowed the practice of infant baptism to continue for centuries as a practice and tradition of the Church if it was not right. Clearly, tradition can go a long way in shaping what we believe.
While we do not cling to the traditions surrounding Mary and her perpetual virginity or special relationship to Christ, the traditions of the Church have gone a long way in shaping what we believe about the importance of the virgin conception and birth of Jesus. The most direct example involves the belief that comes from two of the Fathers of the Western Church, Augustine and Ambrose. They were integral in the development of the doctrine of original sin and therefore saw the virgin birth of Jesus as necessary to his living a sinless life. For centuries, theologians in the Church have contended that this is why we must believe that Jesus was born of a virgin—so that he may truly be sinless. However, in recent years Augustine’s understanding of original sin has come under some scrutiny from all manner of theologians.
If the reasons we typically believe in the virgin birth of Jesus (the Bible says it, tradition backs it, etc.) seem to strain under the weight of contemporary reason and skepticism, then why should we hold such a doctrine? And if we should find that such a belief is worth holding, what real implications can it possibly have on our lives today? Before we get ready to burn those we label as heretics for questioning our long-held beliefs, or before we decide to lay aside faith entirely, let us take a look at the text we have read this morning from Luke’s gospel. Perhaps if we try to understand what the Bible is actually saying here, we will find the true reason as to why we confess our belief in the virgin birth of Jesus.
Luke tells us that the messenger of God, Gabriel, comes to a virgin named Mary in the backwater town of Nazareth in Galilee. He calls her favored one and proceeds to tell her in verses 30-33: “Do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favor with God. And now, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you will name him Jesus. He will be great, and will be called the Son of the Most High, and the Lord God will give to him the throne of his ancestor David. He will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and of his kingdom there will be no end." It is in these particular words from Gabriel that one ought to find the purpose of the entire story of Jesus’ birth: Mary will carry the one who will be called the Son of the Most High, a title that overflows with allusions to the messiah. Furthermore, this child that will be conceived in Mary will have an endless kingdom. This is no ordinary child; in fact, this is no ordinary, extraordinary child!
You see, all throughout Scripture, extraordinary children are born in extraordinary ways: Isaac was born to Abraham and Sarah when Sarah was in her nineties; Rebekah was barren for twenty years before God “opened her womb” and she gave birth to Esau and Jacob; Samson’s mother was barren before an angel appeared to her and said she would bear a son; and prior to our Scripture this morning, Luke tells us of Elizabeth, Mary’s cousin, who was barren and getting on in years. Elizabeth and her husband Zechariah become the proud, aged parents of John (the Baptist). So, all throughout the witness of Scripture great heroes and extraordinary people are born in miraculous and extraordinary ways, but when it comes to the Son of the Most High extraordinary wasn’t enough.
In verse 34 we hear Mary’s response to Gabriel’s proclamation: "How can this be, since I am a virgin?" Sure, Elizabeth was old, but there’s always the biological possibility that her pregnancy was completely natural, but Mary…well Mary hadn’t even been with a man (not to mention that she was likely a teenager when she heard the news of a coming child!). How could she, of all people, possibly have a child? That’s when the angel lays it all out for Mary—and for us—in verse 35: “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; therefore the child to be born will be holy; he will be called Son of God.” After mentioning the pregnancy of Elizabeth, the angel says in verse 37 words that ought to ring in our ears whenever we have doubt about the omnipotence of God: “For nothing will be impossible with God.”
In this exchange between Mary and Gabriel, we don’t simply read an instance where “The Bible says it.” We see why we truly ought to believe in the beyond-extraordinary way in which the Lord was conceived. From the very beginning, Christ cannot be confused as a powerful prophet; he cannot be dismissed simply as an extraordinary king, born of extraordinary circumstances. No, from the very beginning he is the Son of God! Being conceived by the Holy Spirit, born of the Virgin Mary is a unique and sure sign that this child is something beyond the kings and prophets of the past. From the very first moments of the Incarnation, the eternal Son of God is recognized as much more than all that was great before him. In that truth we find the reason for upholding the virgin birth. In that truth, the truth that Jesus is different from all that we could possibly hope for or expect, we find reason to confess with the universal Church, “We believe…[in Jesus Christ] who was conceived by the Holy Spirit, born of the Virgin Mary.” Are you able to confess that today?
Let us pray…